|
View Poll Results: Who do you want at 15? | |||
Quinyon Mitchell | 6 | 26.09% | |
Laiatu Latu | 1 | 4.35% | |
Jared Verse | 1 | 4.35% | |
Dallas Turner | 2 | 8.70% | |
Terrion Arnold | 2 | 8.70% | |
Brian Thomas Jr. | 2 | 8.70% | |
Adonai Mitchell | 0 | 0% | |
Trade Up (Include for whom in a post) | 1 | 4.35% | |
Trade Down (Include explanation in a post) | 5 | 21.74% | |
Other (Include explanation in a post) | 3 | 13.04% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I think trading down will net the Colts a top 5 WR in the class that fits the mold of what the team tries to draft at WR as well as potentially netting another top 50ish pick, which would potentially net the team another quality starter.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Trade back and take Xavier Worthy
Another explosive home run threat paired with AR and JT Makes ARs job easier because he opens things up strictly out of fear While Mitchell would be tough to pass at 15 for what Worthy would provide to the offense and AR I’d be willing to trade back and go CB later. Colts fans will have ptsd if they do this… but he’s not Paris Campbell or Phillip Dorsett he’s more like Desean Jackson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quinyon Mitchell, the best CB in the draft, but i am not sure that he will be there for the Colts at 15. I would also sign Patrick Peterson to sure up the CB position. He can also play safety, providing the depth at both positions. Can also be a big teacher to the young guys.
If Mitchell isn't there, then i would go WR Bryan Thomas, a legit deep threat, with good hands. The WR class is deep and a decent player can be had in the 2nd round, which is not true of the CB class. Big drop off after the top 2 or 3 guys. I am also not as down on what we already have on the roster at CB. Brents, Flowers and Moore are a capable set of cornerbacks, but besides Moore are very inexperienced and both Flowers and Brents struggled with injuries last year. Jaylon Jones and Baker are decent players for the back end of the roster. If you had Mitchell, Brents, Moore, Flowers, Peterson that to me is an outstanding group of CB's. Allows Flowers to recover from his injury completely, Mitchell and Brents can compete and develop, the fallback option if either struggle is Peterson, who intially i would be looking at playing safety. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ukcolt For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (03-31-2024), YDFL Commish (03-31-2024) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Brock Bowers.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Would be nice, if he falls to 15. However, I doubt he does.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I wouldn’t be mad at any weapon for AR but what’s the difference between WRs from outside the top 3 let’s say from 4-11 they seem pretty interchangeable outside of Worthy he seems like the most rare ability wise that’s gonna be available |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
I would be okay with a trade down, but a lot of heads would explode if we do. Ballard has been effective with a trade down and picking up draft capital to select a player or to use to trade back up to get a guy he likes.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think it depends on who’s there, the only player they wouldn’t trade out of 15 is Bowers I believe.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I picked trade down because that just fits Ballard's MO.
If the WR class is as deep as everyone is saying, then a trade down to the mid 20s should receive as compesation a pick something like: IND trades #15 (1050 points) for GB #25 (720 points) and GB 2nd round #58 (320 points) and GB 5th round #169 (23.8 points) 1050 versus 1063.8 because the trades always slightly favor the team trading down. Getting that extra top 60-70 player is pretty big when Ballard always preaches that the more swings you take at the plate, the more hits you get.
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! |
|
|