ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:05 AM
natagu23's Avatar
natagu23 natagu23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,274
Thanks: 114
Thanked 141 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wyatt View Post
I've always heard that OG is the easiest position on the OL to fill late in draft or FA, wouldn't make a whole lot of sense to draft one in the 1st, with our highest pick since Luck
We need a run mauler if we do go guard.

I would like to see us go after Larry Warford in free agency
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:13 AM
HoosierinFL's Avatar
HoosierinFL HoosierinFL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,569
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,655 Times in 794 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indycolts2 View Post
Not sure a high draft pick should be used on o-line this year, not with what we saw over the last handful of games from the young players they were starting. Great o-lines don't just happen overnight, a little continuity from one year to the next helps. Either I'm blind or the o-line did actually have some significant improvement over the last quarter of the season.
I think so too, plus they could very much be helped out by a smarter offensive scheme that doesn't involve shotgun snaps followed by 3-4 step drops.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:34 AM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,749
Thanks: 1,788
Thanked 1,193 Times in 526 Posts
Default

My only point about selecting an O-Lineman anywhere early would be my most likely scenario where someone that the Colts graded as a low 1st round OT was available with their 2nd round pick and they felt like the kid was a plug and play starter at RT.

Or, the Colts trade down to lower in the first round, pick up extra 2nd/3rd/4th round picks and then select one of those OTs whom they think is an immediate starter.

We don't need more guys on the O-Line. Between Reitz, Good, Haeg and Clark, we have a lot of guys that might end up being anywhere from NFL average to NFL good. We need (perhaps) better guys who come into the top of the depth chart, are day one starters (like Ryan Kelly) and can turn into NFL great in a year or two.

Cheers,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
Pez (02-23-2017)
  #34  
Old 02-23-2017, 11:46 AM
natagu23's Avatar
natagu23 natagu23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,274
Thanks: 114
Thanked 141 Times in 72 Posts
Default

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oal9T61thY0

Great Breakdown of Dalvin Cook. Brett Kollmann knows his football.

I still would like to go defense with our first pick, but im listening...

Cook is a little light in the pants, but man is he dynamic.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to natagu23 For This Useful Post:
Coltsalr (02-26-2017)
  #35  
Old 02-24-2017, 12:10 AM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Stop it. You know better.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-24-2017, 01:46 AM
Blue Thunder Blue Thunder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 29
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

If the new GM goes rb in round 1 he's no better than old GM.....unless he gets 3 starters on defense in FA......THEN he can do whatever he wants
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-24-2017, 10:13 AM
HoosierinFL's Avatar
HoosierinFL HoosierinFL is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,569
Thanks: 219
Thanked 1,655 Times in 794 Posts
Default

So I don't follow college ball at all, so I don't know anything about these RBs except that they are considered the top 2 prospects at that position. So the Cook video is interesting but damn, I watched his breakdown on Fournette. Holy shit that guy is a beast. I say we go defense still but if we ended up in a position to take him (I know we won't) I wouldn't be mad at all.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HoosierinFL For This Useful Post:
natagu23 (02-24-2017)
  #38  
Old 02-24-2017, 12:08 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,448
Thanks: 627
Thanked 1,894 Times in 922 Posts
Default

By all accounts, Ballard is a smart guy and was highly sought after as a GM candidate. Then he decided to keep Chucky Clapsalot and I started to wonder. However, I still think he did that because all the good candidates were already gone and he knows he'll get a mulligan for next year anyway.

I still have total confidence that he knows what he's doing. That's why I don't expect a skill position O player at all in the first 4-5 rounds. He needs defense, defense, defense, and more defense.

Cutting the rotting carcass of DQ was a good start.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-24-2017, 12:26 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
By all accounts, Ballard is a smart guy and was highly sought after as a GM candidate. Then he decided to keep Chucky Clapsalot and I started to wonder. However, I still think he did that because all the good candidates were already gone and he knows he'll get a mulligan for next year anyway.

I still have total confidence that he knows what he's doing. That's why I don't expect a skill position O player at all in the first 4-5 rounds. He needs defense, defense, defense, and more defense.

Cutting the rotting carcass of DQ was a good start.
I believe Irsay made the decision to keep Pags, at least for one more year. I don't think Ballard had a choice, at least not this year. In Irsay's press conference when he announced the firing of Griggs, he stated that Pags would be the coach for 2017.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-24-2017, 12:31 PM
natagu23's Avatar
natagu23 natagu23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,274
Thanks: 114
Thanked 141 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Thunder View Post
If the new GM goes rb in round 1 he's no better than old GM.....unless he gets 3 starters on defense in FA......THEN he can do whatever he wants
Yep.

We could sign 2 or 3 defensive starters which could allow us to draft a RB in the first.

Tak vs Dalvin Cook. I'd take Cook assuming Barnett is off the board.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.