Colts and AFC South

[Hoopsdoc]

Originally Posted by ukcolt

I was going to say the same, Tannehill isn't any better. Might shine for the occasional game, but not someone you are intent on building your franchise around.

Tannehill led the league in passer rating this year. And just as I predicted, Tennessee became a playoff team when they benched Mariota and started him.

[Luck4Reich]

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc

Tannehill led the league in passer rating this year. And just as I predicted, Tennessee became a playoff team when they benched Mariota and started him.

Tannehill would have easily been an upgrade over Brissett much more over Hoyer.... but our GM gave them big pay days lol

[Luck4Reich]

Hoopsdoc was spot on about Tannehill.

[Spike]

Originally Posted by Luck4Reich

Tannehill would have easily been an upgrade over Brissett much more over Hoyer.... but our GM gave them big pay days lol

It's really sad that our two QB's are Brissett and Hoyer. I really hated when the Colts signed Hoyer, Puck will probably hate this, but I would have rather had Kelly back up JB. Hoyer is a hack. What a fucking nightmare. Ballard really has his work cut out for him.

[Chaka]

Originally Posted by Spike

It's really sad that our two QB's are Brissett and Hoyer. I really hated when the Colts signed Hoyer, Puck will probably hate this, but I would have rather had Kelly back up JB. Hoyer is a hack. What a fucking nightmare. Ballard really has his work cut out for him.

Hoyer can be cut with minimal cap implications ($1 million if I recall) this offseason, so he was pretty low risk all things considered,

[Colt Classic]

Originally Posted by Chaka

Hoyer can be cut with minimal cap implications ($1 million if I recall) this offseason, so he was pretty low risk all things considered,

All things considered, it was a pretty stupid acquisition. Low risk, yet who realistically expected it to yield ANY reward?