ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-25-2017, 09:19 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,230
Thanks: 1,451
Thanked 4,282 Times in 1,750 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltsalr View Post
So are you blaming Ballard now?
Anyone but pagano
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
Butter (09-25-2017), Coltsalr (09-25-2017), Racehorse (09-25-2017), Spike (09-25-2017)
  #32  
Old 09-25-2017, 10:54 AM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 859
Thanks: 337
Thanked 667 Times in 286 Posts
Default

Any thoughts about Pierre Desir? It looked to my untrained eye like he filled in well under the circumstances.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-25-2017, 11:29 AM
GoBigBlue88 GoBigBlue88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 132
Thanked 1,180 Times in 356 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Any thoughts about Pierre Desir? It looked to my untrained eye like he filled in well under the circumstances.
Also untrained eye: he looks like OK depth. I wouldn't want him starting, but he might be a fine CB4 or CB5.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GoBigBlue88 For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (09-25-2017)
  #34  
Old 09-25-2017, 12:12 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,392
Thanks: 1,995
Thanked 2,223 Times in 1,198 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoBigBlue88 View Post
Also untrained eye: he looks like OK depth. I wouldn't want him starting, but he might be a fine CB4 or CB5.
Yep, yet he's leaps and bounds better than #42, who wouldn't be on my team if not for Pagano's complete incompetence.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-25-2017, 12:30 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 997
Thanks: 548
Thanked 818 Times in 391 Posts
Default

I think we've also been remiss in not mentioning that Ballard has filled the big shoes of Patty Mac with someone that 3 games into the season seems to be performing well and looks to be a viable long term solution. I'm too lazy to look this up but recall hearing that he's 4 in the league in net yards on his punts. Not sure if that includes yesterday's game or not.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 1965southpaw For This Useful Post:
Butter (09-25-2017), Colt Classic (09-25-2017), Racehorse (09-25-2017), VeveJones007 (09-25-2017)
  #36  
Old 09-25-2017, 12:48 PM
GoBigBlue88 GoBigBlue88 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,297
Thanks: 132
Thanked 1,180 Times in 356 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1965southpaw View Post
I think we've also been remiss in not mentioning that Ballard has filled the big shoes of Patty Mac with someone that 3 games into the season seems to be performing well and looks to be a viable long term solution. I'm too lazy to look this up but recall hearing that he's 4 in the league in net yards on his punts. Not sure if that includes yesterday's game or not.
What he lacks in some of McAfee's power and panache, he makes up for in accuracy. McAfee was a terrific punter (even if I find him obnoxious now), but he was more leg and athleticism than accuracy. It's kinda cool to have a punter who can dime a ball on the sidelines and prevent a return from ever happening.

Nice kickoffs yesterday, too.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GoBigBlue88 For This Useful Post:
omahacolt (09-25-2017), Racehorse (09-25-2017), rcubed (09-25-2017)
  #37  
Old 09-25-2017, 06:49 PM
1965southpaw's Avatar
1965southpaw 1965southpaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 997
Thanks: 548
Thanked 818 Times in 391 Posts
Default

Rick Venturi was on JMV today and gave his analysisand while I hate how much he humble brags I do tend to agree with his analysis......He hit on all of the points others have raised here.....the only thing he mentioned that hasn't been covered here is he would give one of 2 offensive game balls to Chud (the other to Jacoby)......reason being he feels that this was the first game in a few years where we have been able to make teams pay for blitzing on us defensively. In his tape review he said that our offense made 6 huge offensive plays by successfullly dealing with their blitz. My memory is not the best and I'm too lazy to look things up but I do recall some of our ugliest losses have been we can't read and adjust to blitzes (ex last few times we played steelers) so this resonated with me.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-25-2017, 08:46 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,869
Thanks: 1,825
Thanked 1,134 Times in 642 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChoppedWood View Post
We just barely held off a team that won one game last year. Actually, if our coach wasn't such a worthless putz we might be 2-0 with Brissett. All the more evidence that our coaching sucks and is the peak of a tall stack of problems.
I don't give a fuck what they did last year, Big Ben nor Flacco put up the numbers Brissett did vs that defense

And our coach didn't lose the AZ game a BS roughing the passer and Brissetts only bad throw did
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-25-2017, 08:48 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,202
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,237 Times in 1,169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1965southpaw View Post
Rick Venturi was on JMV today and gave his analysisand while I hate how much he humble brags I do tend to agree with his analysis......He hit on all of the points others have raised here.....the only thing he mentioned that hasn't been covered here is he would give one of 2 offensive game balls to Chud (the other to Jacoby)......reason being he feels that this was the first game in a few years where we have been able to make teams pay for blitzing on us defensively. In his tape review he said that our offense made 6 huge offensive plays by successfullly dealing with their blitz. My memory is not the best and I'm too lazy to look things up but I do recall some of our ugliest losses have been we can't read and adjust to blitzes (ex last few times we played steelers) so this resonated with me.
The first half play calling was excellent, playing to the strengths. I am willing to accept that the second half is probably on Pagano going full prevent. Not a huge Chud fan, but he did a great job in the first half.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-25-2017, 08:53 PM
ChoppedWood ChoppedWood is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 2,900
Thanked 1,994 Times in 1,136 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
I don't give a fuck what they did last year, Big Ben nor Flacco put up the numbers Brissett did vs that defense

And our coach didn't lose the AZ game a BS roughing the passer and Brissetts only bad throw did
Do you ever actually like watch football - ever?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.