ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-26-2017, 09:19 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,051
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1965southpaw View Post
PFF has rated our running backs dead last.....#32. Do I think we are at the top or even middle of the pack? No. But 32? That's crazy.
PFF doesn't produce a single thing that isn't subjective, so all that means is PFF is biased against the Colts RBs.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
omahacolt (07-27-2017)
  #32  
Old 07-27-2017, 10:50 AM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

I think our running backs are bad and near the bottom of the league.

You can't rely on a 33 year old RB as your primary option. Hopefully Mack will emerge and can split carries about 50-50 with Gore.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-27-2017, 12:30 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,753
Thanks: 1,819
Thanked 1,197 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
PFF doesn't produce a single thing that isn't subjective, so all that means is PFF is biased against the Colts RBs.
Not quite true. All of their "grades" are subjective and I am beginning to really lean against trusting them (I know, I know....I have been their biggest fan....)

However, they sometimes use pure # of snaps or pure performance numbers (yards, tackles, etc) as evidence to some of their points and I think that you can trust those types of numbers to be pretty accurate.

But the grades? Yeah, becoming less and less of a fan every month.

Cheers,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-27-2017, 06:40 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,421
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 2,253 Times in 1,213 Posts
Default

Apparently we also rank as the 25th offensive arsenal in the NFL. WTF!

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...017-nfl-season
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-27-2017, 06:52 PM
testcase448
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Apparently we also rank as the 25th offensive arsenal in the NFL. WTF!

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...017-nfl-season
That's what happens after years of Grigson, you suck across the board.


[sarcasm] Pagano covered up Grigson's shortcomings [/sarcasm]
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-27-2017, 06:59 PM
Indiana V2's Avatar
Indiana V2 Indiana V2 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 5,630
Thanks: 858
Thanked 414 Times in 270 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Apparently we also rank as the 25th offensive arsenal in the NFL. WTF!

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...017-nfl-season
I feel even dumber having read through that list.
__________________
Irsay and Ballard got the Reich guy!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-28-2017, 12:15 PM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

How is Carolina ranked 12th on that list? Kelvin Benjamin sucked last year and there have basically no one behind him. Greg Olsen is good but your primary target can't be a TE.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-28-2017, 03:30 PM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,468
Thanks: 925
Thanked 839 Times in 494 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrSpaceman View Post
How is Carolina ranked 12th on that list? Kelvin Benjamin sucked last year and there have basically no one behind him. Greg Olsen is good but your primary target can't be a TE.
See my above post........
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-29-2017, 09:57 AM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,599
Thanks: 233
Thanked 984 Times in 484 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Apparently we also rank as the 25th offensive arsenal in the NFL. WTF!

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/2...017-nfl-season

I'd say it's deserving. Last year they were 23rd and they start this year with a HUGE question mark at QB, which on this team means everything. If Luck is healthy all season, the Colts easily surpass all expectations (except for a few of freaks members) for the season. As for the running backs? They need some serious upgrading at this position.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-29-2017, 01:35 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,147
Thanks: 1,287
Thanked 1,324 Times in 748 Posts
Default

Looking on the bright side either we prove all of the naysayers wrong or we finally get rid of Clappy and his wood chopping dipshits. Either way we win.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to IndyNorm For This Useful Post:
Indiana V2 (07-29-2017), sherck (07-29-2017)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.