ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-18-2017, 07:09 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,751
Thanks: 1,791
Thanked 1,195 Times in 527 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
I don't want the Williams dude at all,

I'd take Peppers over him anyday
I agree that Tim Williams scares me. Relatively limited reps in college and the off the field stuff.

Careful vetting pkease, Ballard.

Cheers.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-18-2017, 07:33 PM
indycolts2 indycolts2 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Upstate NY......yes people NYC is not NY State.
Posts: 1,636
Thanks: 107
Thanked 130 Times in 71 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
most of you racists would love that pick


he would be an immediate fan favorite. and don't even pretend that i am not 100% correct
If it made your head explode it would be worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-20-2017, 01:13 AM
natagu23's Avatar
natagu23 natagu23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4,274
Thanks: 114
Thanked 141 Times in 72 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
I agree that Tim Williams scares me. Relatively limited reps in college and the off the field stuff.

Careful vetting pkease, Ballard.

Cheers.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I watched Tim Williams during the college playoffs. The guy doesn't impress me. He lacks pass rush moves imo.

For a lot of these pass rushers, once they get stopped by tackle on their speed rush, they're done.

No counters, no swim moves, bull rush etc.

Williams is good against the run which is always a plus. Alabama's whole defense was good against run for that matter.

Last edited by natagu23; 02-20-2017 at 04:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-20-2017, 09:21 AM
ukcolt ukcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,243
Thanks: 72
Thanked 294 Times in 157 Posts
Default

I am always a little wary when looking at guys from the likes of Bama, Ohio St, and previously USC, as yeah they are talented guys, but it is always easier to look good when you have lots of other guys around you who are also high quality guys who are often assignment sound. I am not saying that they are not necessarily the best players in the nation, but i sometimes wonder just how good they might appear to be if they were playing for a mid level team.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ukcolt For This Useful Post:
Mr. Session (02-20-2017)
  #35  
Old 02-20-2017, 08:27 PM
Mr. Session's Avatar
Mr. Session Mr. Session is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 715
Thanks: 286
Thanked 493 Times in 225 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by natagu23 View Post
I watched Tim Williams during the college playoffs. The guy doesn't impress me. He lacks pass rush moves imo.

For a lot of these pass rushers, once they get stopped by tackle on their speed rush, they're done.

No counters, no swim moves, bull rush etc.

Williams is good against the run which is always a plus. Alabama's whole defense was good against run for that matter.
I felt like Williams had a good jump and speed rush, that's about it.

What do you think about Anderson? Outside of Foster I'm hard pressed to give you a better linebacker out of Alabama right now.

Anderson is strong and his technique is impressive. He knows how to use his hands.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-21-2017, 11:16 AM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

I think if Derek Barnett is there when we pick, take him and adjust the defense to more even fronts. He could maybe develop into an OLB but right now we need talent more than we need scheme fit.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-21-2017, 07:33 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,392
Thanks: 1,995
Thanked 2,223 Times in 1,198 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
I think if Derek Barnett is there when we pick, take him and adjust the defense to more even fronts. He could maybe develop into an OLB but right now we need talent more than we need scheme fit.

I like Barnett a lot. I believe he will run Terrell Suggs type of numbers at the combine, and that will scare some teams off. If his 10 yd split is respectable, it would be really hard not to take him.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
natagu23 (02-22-2017), Racehorse (02-22-2017)
  #38  
Old 02-21-2017, 07:35 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
I like Barnett a lot. I believe he will run Terrell Suggs type of numbers at the combine, and that will scare some teams off. If his 10 yd split is respectable, it would be really hard not to take him.
Suggs is who he reminds me of.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-21-2017, 09:53 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

You would think that Pagano/Monachino would be all over a guy that's reminiscent to Suggs. How sad is it that I (and probably most of us) would have no faith that they'd be able to spot that?

Then again, given Pagano'a track record in terms of pounding the table for guys, even if he did, Ballard might be inclined to ignore him, at least I would be. Hopefully he stole some of the pre-draft notes from Dorsey/Reid prior to leaving Kansas City.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-22-2017, 12:26 AM
Blue Thunder Blue Thunder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 29
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Tyrus Bowser later in the draft......3rd or 4th round.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.