#31
|
||||
|
||||
This, plus the non-flag on Prescott's intentional grounding. That ball was 5 yards short of the LoS and at the feet of a lineman.
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
I will take it
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
I’d rather wait and see how he does next season. If he does better and you still want to trade him, then he raised his value. If not then his value stays about the same. But his talent is worth it to me to have another year. And he does seem to be doing his job, I haven’t read any complaints about him from the coaches.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Also, isn’t that reviewable? |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Regarding.Hooker. I was excited about him when we drafted him. I love a playmaking, ball-hawking safety. But either he isnt’ who we thought, or he is wasted in this defense. Either way, if we were able to trade him for a 3rd or better, I would be happy with that. I just don’t think it is going to work out. I’m not mad at Hooker either. I just don’t think it’s a good fit.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Eh, I'm OK with Hooker still erasing big plays on the back end. There's presumably a reason teams aren't airing it out against the Colts. Sure, if you can get a high pick and argue a 2nd-3rd round safety could do the same thing in this system, have at it. But for now, I'm OK with riding Hooker deep.
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GoBigBlue88 For This Useful Post: | ||
Butter (12-17-2018), Colt Classic (12-16-2018), natagu23 (12-17-2018), Oldcolt (12-17-2018), sherck (12-17-2018), VeveJones007 (12-17-2018) |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Free of Frank! |
The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post: | ||
southside asshole (12-16-2018) |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
The plus side to never using anything on free agency is that Ballard should be able to lock up Kelly/Nelson/Leonard/etc. with no worries at all.
__________________
Free of Frank! |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And he does not want to come tackle |
|
|