ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-23-2018, 05:12 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

A lot of rumors in this NFL.com post.

Bills unlikely to move up to #2:

Quote:
Appearing on Monday's edition of Good Morning Football, NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport cautioned not to read too much into Bills GM Brandon Beane's history with new Giants boss Dave Gettleman.

"From what I understand, it's not going to be one of those things where they just sell out and (trade) all the way to No. 2 with the Giants," Rapoport said. "I would be at this moment surprised if that happens."

The Bills are more likely to pull the trigger if a signal-caller they like slips to No. 5 or No. 6, Rapoport added.

To a lesser extent, the speculation surrounding Buffalo's intentions applies to Miami at No. 11 and Arizona at No. 15.
Allen is not going to be the Browns pick:

Quote:
@theMMQB

Surprise! A source told @SI_PeterKing that Cleveland will NOT take Josh Allen with the first pick. Here's why the Browns may take Sam Darnold first:
Broncos could move up or down:

Quote:
5. Starting Monday, per NFL Network's James Palmer, the Broncos are going through hypothetical scenarios that involve trading out of the draft's No. 5 spot. While most speculation has centered on the possibility of John Elway trading down to collect picks, he's also open to a trade up.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-23-2018, 05:12 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Last year was pretty crazy with all the trades for QBs. This year's 1st round is shaping up to be even nuttier.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-23-2018, 05:14 PM
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 375
Thanks: 94
Thanked 149 Times in 88 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Last year was pretty crazy with all the trades for QBs. This year's 1st round is shaping up to be even nuttier.

And you got Jackson and Rudolph. Pats apparently like Jackson.

Last edited by Chromeburn; 04-24-2018 at 12:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-23-2018, 05:18 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
And you got got Jackson and Rudolph. Pats apparently like Jackson.
Yep. I expect both of them to go Round 1 as well.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-23-2018, 05:18 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Per the Browns speculation above. Possible the Allen source was given fake info.

Quote:
@AllbrightNFL
New #Browns front office is very concerned with finding out where the leaks have been coming from the last few years, and closing ranks/controlling the message, going forward.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-24-2018, 09:40 AM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 5,373
Thanks: 500
Thanked 574 Times in 331 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
I have now seen from a couple of sites recently that a trade with BUF would not be both of their 1st round choices but instead be something like:

IND trades #6 overall

BUF trades #12, #53 (2nd round), #56 (2nd round), #96 (3rd round)

BUF would then have #6, #22 and #65 (3rd round) to work with while IND would now be picking:

1st round - #12
2nd round - #36, #37, #49, #53, #56
3rd round - #67, #96
+ extra 2nd round pick in 2019.

8 picks in the top 100 of 2018 would be a pretty great way to super charge the "rebuild."

Would you trade for that combo?

Walk Worthy,
this would be an incredible trade
__________________
If you're not a Freak then you're just on the bandwagon
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-24-2018, 10:04 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,319
Thanks: 25
Thanked 273 Times in 174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
I have now seen from a couple of sites recently that a trade with BUF would not be both of their 1st round choices but instead be something like:

IND trades #6 overall

BUF trades #12, #53 (2nd round), #56 (2nd round), #96 (3rd round)

BUF would then have #6, #22 and #65 (3rd round) to work with while IND would now be picking:

1st round - #12
2nd round - #36, #37, #49, #53, #56
3rd round - #67, #96
+ extra 2nd round pick in 2019.

8 picks in the top 100 of 2018 would be a pretty great way to super charge the "rebuild."

Would you trade for that combo?

Walk Worthy,
Absolutely, then I'd use all that second round leverage to move back into the mid-late 20s, preferably before Pittsburgh.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-24-2018, 02:18 PM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 2,352
Thanks: 181
Thanked 154 Times in 109 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
I have now seen from a couple of sites recently that a trade with BUF would not be both of their 1st round choices but instead be something like:

IND trades #6 overall

BUF trades #12, #53 (2nd round), #56 (2nd round), #96 (3rd round)

BUF would then have #6, #22 and #65 (3rd round) to work with while IND would now be picking:

1st round - #12
2nd round - #36, #37, #49, #53, #56
3rd round - #67, #96
+ extra 2nd round pick in 2019.

8 picks in the top 100 of 2018 would be a pretty great way to super charge the "rebuild."

Would you trade for that combo?

Walk Worthy,
No, #22 has to be in play.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to njcoltfan For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (04-25-2018)
  #29  
Old 04-24-2018, 02:49 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by njcoltfan View Post
No, #22 has to be in play.
Agree. I wouldn't move out of #6 unless I get get something like Smith/Edmunds+Landry/LVE/Evans.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-24-2018, 03:43 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,923
Thanks: 523
Thanked 383 Times in 219 Posts
Default

Quote:
@RapSheet: "The Arizona Cardinals may be the team to watch at this point. They certainly seem like they’re making the most phone calls about possibly moving up for a quarterback ... it’s safe to assume that 5 or 6 could be potential slots to trade for a quarterback."
Pretty sure Ballard doesn't want to drop that far, but it would give him better bargaining power to push Buffalo for both of their 1sts+.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.