|
View Poll Results: Who do you want at 15? | |||
Quinyon Mitchell | 6 | 26.09% | |
Laiatu Latu | 1 | 4.35% | |
Jared Verse | 1 | 4.35% | |
Dallas Turner | 2 | 8.70% | |
Terrion Arnold | 2 | 8.70% | |
Brian Thomas Jr. | 2 | 8.70% | |
Adonai Mitchell | 0 | 0% | |
Trade Up (Include for whom in a post) | 1 | 4.35% | |
Trade Down (Include explanation in a post) | 5 | 21.74% | |
Other (Include explanation in a post) | 3 | 13.04% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
I picked trade down because that just fits Ballard's MO.
If the WR class is as deep as everyone is saying, then a trade down to the mid 20s should receive as compesation a pick something like: IND trades #15 (1050 points) for GB #25 (720 points) and GB 2nd round #58 (320 points) and GB 5th round #169 (23.8 points) 1050 versus 1063.8 because the trades always slightly favor the team trading down. Getting that extra top 60-70 player is pretty big when Ballard always preaches that the more swings you take at the plate, the more hits you get.
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
If Bowers is there then I definitely want us to take him. If he's gone then BT or Mitchell or BTJr. Although I'm sure trading down is the most likely.
Quote:
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
These same people insisted we had to have a Knight descendant coaching at IU. They wanted Alford for years but that dude clearly sucks. They wanted Woodson, and he's done nothing to show he's any better than anyone hired post-Knight. These same people will be losing their minds over us not drafting Arch Manning in a few years. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HoosierinFL For This Useful Post: | ||
Discflinger (04-01-2024), Racehorse (04-01-2024) |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He is also a good returner. But if I’m Steichen I’m looking at potential mismatches and YAC guys. Bowers, Corley, Worthy, BTj, Mitchell. He wants more explosive plays and there are quite a few receivers lost in this draft that have r was on good speed. Last edited by Chromeburn; 04-01-2024 at 11:44 PM. |
#26
|
||||
|
||||
And Grigson bailed them out a little.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
The Following User Says Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post: | ||
Chromeburn (04-01-2024) |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Arnold, but most decisions here aren't going to bother me. I'm fine if the Colts trade back a bit, or trade up a bit for a guy like Bowers or Nabors or whoever.
Also don't care that much if they draft Mitchell over Arnold. Any good CB would be huge though, and if they stay at #15 I hope they get one of them.
__________________
Free of Frank! |
The Following User Says Thank You to nate505 For This Useful Post: | ||
TheMugwump (04-08-2024) |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
I see Corley and Legette as round two. Corley has a lot to learn as a receiver still. He’s compared to Deebo but Deebo was much more refined as a receiver. But he is a weapon in the open field.legettes lack of production worries me late two imo. I’m not a huge fan of Mitchell, think he should have produced more, and he was hurt the first two years at Georgia. I think Worthy has jumped Mitchell and is top 20 now.
Last edited by Chromeburn; 04-01-2024 at 11:34 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
apballin (04-01-2024) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
You don’t like Worthy at all?
|
|
|