#381
|
|||
|
|||
That would just be stupid for the Giants.
|
#382
|
||||
|
||||
For what it's worth that is what Schefter is reporting ? See original edited post with link...
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
#383
|
||||
|
||||
Them taking Chubb 2 would increase the Colts likelihood off trading down.
|
#384
|
||||
|
||||
Nelson if I am GM ... If Denver doesn't take him at #5
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
#385
|
||||
|
||||
its also rumored that BUF will trade to #2 for a QB and giants will use all the picks to bolster team for Eli's last years.
|
#386
|
|||
|
|||
Oh good, it's Gettleman's smokescreen, fair enough.
|
#387
|
||||
|
||||
I think the Giants would be crazy to pass on a QB. Eli Manning is 37 and hasn't played consistently well in years.
|
#388
|
||||
|
||||
Haslem sat in the rain in the USC stands with Darnold's parents yesterday at his pro day.......Cleveland seems to be focusing in on him as their top choice. I don't see NY trading out of their 2 to get Eli's replacement and Jets moved up specifically to get a QB.......We got a good shot at Chubb/Nelson/Fitzpatrick.
|
#389
|
|||
|
|||
Giants have some dead cap from JPP trade, but maybe they needed a little more room to fit extra draft picks from Buffalo into their cap.
|
#390
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Interesting. If this is true, then its a good thing we traded down when we did. If we waited until after the Giants made this trade, other teams might have perceived us as more eager to trade down since we were not going to get our guy (Chubb), and perhaps we might not have had the leverage to pull off the Jets trade. |
|
|