Pagano Watch

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by Racehorse

Here are some stats from the article, which you clearly did not read:

None of those statistics makes the author's conjecture that he cited as a statistic anything more than conjecture.

[Dam8610]

Originally Posted by ChoppedWood

That fucker Grigson only signed guys that play 3 qtrs of football- but he fucking paid them like they played 4! Stupid Grigson, if he gave Chuck guys that played 4 quarters of football, we would be undefeated right now.

Go team Pagano!

Eh, most of the close games the team has lost have been a result of a costly turnover at the wrong time from our young developing QB. I'd call it growing pains more than anything, which is exactly what you'd expect from a team that needed a great deal of its roster overhauled.

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by Dam8610

None of those statistics makes the author's conjecture that he cited as a statistic anything more than conjecture.

Stats are relevant? I never knew. What data would you accept as evidence? A proclamation from God?

[dwilli57]

Originally Posted by rcubed

I like this one:

Here’s the breakdown of raw points in progression through each quarter (Points Earned vs Points Allowed):

1st (Even) | 2nd (+15) | 3rd (+6) | 4th (-44)

If I worked for this organization and didn't care about having a job tomorrow I'd tape this post to the office doors of Irsay (not that he can read), Ballard and Pagano (not that he can read).

[rcubed]

Originally Posted by Dam8610

None of those statistics makes the author's conjecture that he cited as a statistic anything more than conjecture.

You are correct in that the author should not have used the word 'stat' in that sentence.

But man, you hold on to and argue the most inane points.

You arent even arguing what he was trying to say, you are just arguing about a word.

[smitty46953]

Originally Posted by rcubed

You are correct in that the author should not have used the word 'stat' in that sentence.

But man, you hold on to and argue the most inane points.

You arent even arguing what he was trying to say, you are just arguing about a word.

He loves to argue, proved him wrong once in old days when I gave a shit and he never posted in that thread again. Often seen arguing with inanimate objects such as stop signs etc ...

[Butter]

Originally Posted by smitty46953

He loves to argue, proved him wrong once in old days when I gave a shit and he never posted in that thread again. Often seen arguing with inanimate objects such as stop signs etc ...

He is best tuned out, too bad always felt like he was intelligent and had a lot to offer, but with all this Pagano shit he has proven that wrong. Best ignored.

[omahacolt]

Originally Posted by Butter

He is best tuned out, too bad always felt like he was intelligent and had a lot to offer, but with all this Pagano shit he has proven that wrong. Best ignored.

Pretty much has zero credibility. Too much of a pussy to admit he was wrong

[YDFL Commish]

Originally Posted by Dam8610

Eh, most of the close games the team has lost have been a result of a costly turnover at the wrong time from our young developing QB. I'd call it growing pains more than anything, which is exactly what you'd expect from a team that needed a great deal of its roster overhauled.

You don't actually watch football do you?

[ChoppedWood]

Originally Posted by YDFL Commish

You don't actually watch football do you?

There's been some talk that we are going to evolve to a viewing experience where you will be able to assign your viewing preference to specific players where a camera will basically ISO them for you in a corner of the screen in a split screen / red zone type experience (for a premium price of course) (Thursday night's telecast with the whole game in "sky view" was one of the first steps in this regard- which I hated by the way).

Imagine if you will a sort of DraftKings roster display where fans get to pick the player they want their game focused on. You'd have a list that would start at the top with:

Brady= 457,638 Total viewers / 387,653 MA / 28,265 NY, 13,543 CA...etc
Rodgers= 398,543 Total viewers / 298,435 WI / 64,342 MN / 23,459 IL...etc
Brown= 287,543 Total viewers / 267,543 PA / 16,543 WV...etc
and on down the list of star players in the NFL who make the game fun to watch...

You could then scroll to the bottom...At the very bottom of the list...
Pagano= 1 / 1 IN

...and there every week would reside Dam with his custom ordered Colts stitched jersey with the number of 1 and "Pagano" proudly displayed on the back cheering at full throat every time there was a clapping session and coming out of his seat with each and every challenge flag thrown! I suspect bodily fluid tissue moments would ensue each time there was a mysteriously ill timed time out called and his custom camera focused on Chuck calling the ref's over to discuss if it was a shooting foul or if it was called on the floor...