ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-14-2023, 04:28 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,669
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
But no one wants to pay to go get that guy, either.
I think it's going to be Levis, Minshew, and Ehlinger. The only money involved will be for Minshew.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
Lov2fish (03-14-2023)
  #12  
Old 03-14-2023, 04:43 PM
Lov2fish's Avatar
Lov2fish Lov2fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 978
Thanks: 642
Thanked 926 Times in 430 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
But no one wants to pay to go get that guy, either.
They don't want to pay because he wants 250-300 mil guaranteed after two injury shortened seasons. Nobody is crazy enough to do it. He should take what the Ravens are offering and prove everyone wrong.
__________________
Life is hard, its harder if you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-14-2023, 05:02 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,050
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish View Post
They don't want to pay because he wants 250-300 mil guaranteed after two injury shortened seasons. Nobody is crazy enough to do it. He should take what the Ravens are offering and prove everyone wrong.
I meant the accurate QB who can put the ball where only his receiver can get it. No one wants to pay the price in draft capital to go up and get him, and no one wants to pay the price in money to go get an established veteran starting QB. So I guess the Colts are just going to continue to be bad for the foreseeable future, and everyone here is okay with that because they didn't "overpay" to get the #1 pick and they didn't "overpay" to get a quality veteran starter.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.

Last edited by Dam8610; 03-14-2023 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-14-2023, 05:41 PM
Lov2fish's Avatar
Lov2fish Lov2fish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 978
Thanks: 642
Thanked 926 Times in 430 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I meant the accurate QB who can put the ball where only his receiver can get it. No one wants to pay the price in draft capital to go up and get him, and no one wants to pay the price in money to go get an established veteran starting QB. So I guess the Colts are just going to continue to be bad for the foreseeable future, and everyone here is okay with that because they didn't "overpay" to get the #1 pick and they didn't "overpay" to get a quality veteran starter.

Can you apply for the GM job in Jacksonville. They are starting to get good, even with the "Bust" QB. We don't need them being good and you would go a long way in assuring this. The other two are already dysfunctional.
__________________
Life is hard, its harder if you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lov2fish For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (03-14-2023)
  #15  
Old 03-14-2023, 05:49 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,059
Thanks: 2,388
Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I meant the accurate QB who can put the ball where only his receiver can get it. No one wants to pay the price in draft capital to go up and get him, and no one wants to pay the price in money to go get an established veteran starting QB. So I guess the Colts are just going to continue to be bad for the foreseeable future, and everyone here is okay with that because they didn't "overpay" to get the #1 pick and they didn't "overpay" to get a quality veteran starter.
Please just stop it. When has Irsay EVER not spent money? Edge came up short on 1000 yards when he played hurt. Jim took care of him. Irsay has a weakness, he loves football PLAYERS. Jim is a lot of things, and one of them is a good judge of heart in a player.

Irsay cant fall back on some other stream of income. His income is the Colts. Woody Johnson will raise the price on baby powder to pay for Aaron Rodgers. IWhile there is a cap, that money can be stretched out to remain in 5he rules, Uber rich owners can rebound teams faster than owners like Irsay.

And he doled out money last year for a Qb that came up short. In your perfect world where everything goes as planed, shit never happens. The problem is that 99% of us on this board live in a world where shit happens every day.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2023, 06:18 PM
ukcolt ukcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,244
Thanks: 72
Thanked 295 Times in 158 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I meant the accurate QB who can put the ball where only his receiver can get it. No one wants to pay the price in draft capital to go up and get him, and no one wants to pay the price in money to go get an established veteran starting QB. So I guess the Colts are just going to continue to be bad for the foreseeable future, and everyone here is okay with that because they didn't "overpay" to get the #1 pick and they didn't "overpay" to get a quality veteran starter.
I would pay the price for Mahomes, Burrow, Allen, Herbert, possibly Hurts, and maybe Watson, but to me there isn't another QB in the league worth pushing all of the chips into the centre of the table. And certainly not in this draft class either. The 4th pick will get you a shot at a QB who is likely to give you good production as a starter, but still has much to prove.

Bringing in someone like Rodgers, would be a huge upgrade, i am not doubting that, but for how much longer? He isn't at the peak of his powers anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2023, 07:14 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 1,287
Thanked 1,324 Times in 748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I meant the accurate QB who can put the ball where only his receiver can get it. No one wants to pay the price in draft capital to go up and get him, and no one wants to pay the price in money to go get an established veteran starting QB. So I guess the Colts are just going to continue to be bad for the foreseeable future, and everyone here is okay with that because they didn't "overpay" to get the #1 pick and they didn't "overpay" to get a quality veteran starter.
So what exactly do you want anyone on here to do about it other than just agree with you to feed your ego? Ballard, who you've stated is a very good GM in your opinion, obviously either doesn't think Stroud is worth the cost to trade up or he thinks Stroud will still be there at #4 (or possibly 3 with a trade up to AZ).

And FWIW I do agree with you that Stroud is the top QB in the draft. I'm just not going to lose any sleep over this like I did when Ballard decided to hand the starting LT job to Matt Pryor.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-14-2023, 07:15 PM
IndyNorm's Avatar
IndyNorm IndyNorm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,146
Thanks: 1,287
Thanked 1,324 Times in 748 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lov2fish View Post
Can you apply for the GM job in Jacksonville. They are starting to get good, even with the "Bust" QB. We don't need them being good and you would go a long way in assuring this. The other two are already dysfunctional.
That would be amazing. Dam would probably trade that "bust" to us for the 5th rounder we just picked up from Dallas.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-14-2023, 07:17 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,421
Thanks: 2,033
Thanked 2,253 Times in 1,213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyNorm View Post
So what exactly do you want anyone on here to do about it other than just agree with you to feed your ego? Ballard, who you've stated is a very good GM in your opinion, obviously either doesn't think Stroud is worth the cost to trade up or he thinks Stroud will still be there at #4 (or possibly 3 with a trade up to AZ).

And FWIW I do agree with you that Stroud is the top QB in the draft. I'm just not going to lose any sleep over this like I did when Ballard decided to hand the starting LT job to Matt Pryor.
Even if you agree with Dam, if you don't do it in the way he would prefer, you are wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
Brylok (03-14-2023), IndyNorm (03-14-2023), Lov2fish (03-14-2023)
  #20  
Old 03-14-2023, 07:22 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,669
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Even if you agree with Dam, if you don't do it in the way he would prefer, you are wrong.
Ha!
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
IndyNorm (03-14-2023)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.