ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

View Poll Results: With the third pick...
Barkley 7 14.29%
Chubb 17 34.69%
Nelson 3 6.12%
Trade back 21 42.86%
Other 1 2.04%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 01-10-2018, 11:23 PM
Indiana V2's Avatar
Indiana V2 Indiana V2 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Goshen, IN
Posts: 5,630
Thanks: 858
Thanked 414 Times in 270 Posts
Default

I initially voted to trade back, but I'm leaning towards a disruptive pass rusher.
__________________
Irsay and Ballard got the Reich guy!
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 01-10-2018, 11:49 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
Last year 3 RB's went 1st round

All 3 teams made the playoffs

A dynamic back like Barkley can make a hell of a difference
No, two RBs went in the 1st round last year. Yes, both of their teams made the playoffs, but two RBs in the 3rd round had better years and both of their teams also made the playoffs.
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 01-11-2018, 02:01 AM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,051
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana V2 View Post
I initially voted to trade back, but I'm leaning towards a disruptive pass rusher.
Is that guy there, though? Chubb could be, he could not be. If you have to squint too much to see it, it might be wiser to trade down and pick up Roquon Smith or someone else that they feel will be a playmaker.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
Thorgrim (01-11-2018)
  #134  
Old 01-11-2018, 02:32 AM
nate505 nate505 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 4,723
Thanks: 2,143
Thanked 2,537 Times in 1,488 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
I would prefer a bad ass defensive player, but if ballard actually takes barkley, I wont kill him for it.
Same here. If he really is the next AP then I couldn't be too upset. It also doesn't hurt his case when there is not a Von Miller slam dunk defensive pass rusher or a sure fire 10+ year pro bowler tackle available.
__________________
Free of Frank!
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 01-11-2018, 09:49 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Is that guy there, though? Chubb could be, he could not be. If you have to squint too much to see it, it might be wiser to trade down and pick up Roquon Smith or someone else that they feel will be a playmaker.
Might be able to trade down to 5 or 6 and still get Chubb. I'd feel very good about that.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
Mr. Session (01-11-2018)
  #136  
Old 01-11-2018, 12:48 PM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,753
Thanks: 1,819
Thanked 1,197 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Might be able to trade down to 5 or 6 and still get Chubb. I'd feel very good about that.
#3 overall is valued at 2,200 points according to most charts.

#5 overall (1,700) + 2nd round 5th pick, #37 overall (530) = 2,230 points. About an even trade with us perhaps having to throw in a 6th or 7th round pick to even it out.

To drop from #5 with same year compensation, you need to drop down to #11 overall to get another 2nd rounder:

#11 overall (1,250) + 2nd round 11th pick, #43 overall (470) = 1,720 points.

So, some of the options appear to be something like:

Option A = Pick #03 + #35.

Option B = Pick #05 + #35 + #37

Option C = Pick #11 + #35 + #37 + #43

Honestly, I choose option C above. 4 guys in the top 43 beats 2 guys in the top 35 when we have as many holes on our roster as we do.

Of course, you can slide down less from pick #5 if you want to just pick up 3rd or 4th round choices instead of 2nd round choices. I would rather get guys in the top 50 than guys in the 100s.

Walk Worthy,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post:
njcoltfan (01-12-2018), Thorgrim (01-11-2018), YDFL Commish (01-11-2018)
  #137  
Old 01-11-2018, 01:42 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,421
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 2,253 Times in 1,213 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
To drop from #5 with same year compensation, you need to drop down to #11 overall to get another 2nd rounder:

Option C = Pick #11 + #35 + #37 + #43

Walk Worthy,
I really like this scenario. Because it could yield:

#11 Harold Landry
#35 Sony Michel
#37 Will Hernandez
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 01-11-2018, 03:14 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,051
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,639 Times in 948 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sherck View Post
#3 overall is valued at 2,200 points according to most charts.

#5 overall (1,700) + 2nd round 5th pick, #37 overall (530) = 2,230 points. About an even trade with us perhaps having to throw in a 6th or 7th round pick to even it out.

To drop from #5 with same year compensation, you need to drop down to #11 overall to get another 2nd rounder:

#11 overall (1,250) + 2nd round 11th pick, #43 overall (470) = 1,720 points.

So, some of the options appear to be something like:

Option A = Pick #03 + #35.

Option B = Pick #05 + #35 + #37

Option C = Pick #11 + #35 + #37 + #43

Honestly, I choose option C above. 4 guys in the top 43 beats 2 guys in the top 35 when we have as many holes on our roster as we do.

Of course, you can slide down less from pick #5 if you want to just pick up 3rd or 4th round choices instead of 2nd round choices. I would rather get guys in the top 50 than guys in the 100s.

Walk Worthy,
I understand the draft value charts, but they're static and don't take into account things like a team deciding they have to have a certain player, i.e. Washington with RGIII. I'm really hoping Denver ends up deciding they need a certain QB (don't care which one as long as they're likely to be available at 3) and "overpays" based on the draft chart to move up to 3 while the Colts get 5, 36, and Denver's 2019 1. They still have their choice of defender at 5 in all likelihood, and there are still trade opportunities there if for some reason the front office feels this draft is deeper than it is topheavy.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 01-11-2018, 05:14 PM
Thorgrim's Avatar
Thorgrim Thorgrim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 473
Thanked 1,242 Times in 697 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I understand the draft value charts, but they're static and don't take into account things like a team deciding they have to have a certain player, i.e. Washington with RGIII. I'm really hoping Denver ends up deciding they need a certain QB (don't care which one as long as they're likely to be available at 3) and "overpays" based on the draft chart to move up to 3 while the Colts get 5, 36, and Denver's 2019 1. They still have their choice of defender at 5 in all likelihood, and there are still trade opportunities there if for some reason the front office feels this draft is deeper than it is topheavy.
Not sure we can swing this but I'm all in favor of more draft picks. I'm just not enamored with who's likely hitting free agency and we have a lot of holes to fill. I would go out and pay whatever it takes to get Pugh from the giants and then one other quality starter at a position of need. Overpay if necessary. Follow that up with a slew of picks in the draft and we should see improvement on the field.
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 01-11-2018, 06:17 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,322
Thanks: 1,432
Thanked 3,663 Times in 2,048 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
I am finding it harder to pass up Barkley. I know I shouldn't draft a RB that high with our line issues, but he does look awesome. Draft him, build the line with best FA available and some picks over the next two years....

If ballard truly goes with BPA, I could see him pick barkley.

In the end, I would probably pick chubb though.
I wouldn't feel too bad, they guy is a dynamic weapon. And not just a RB but a WR too and maybe best pass blocking back in the draft. Venturi had a nice quote, he was told early on by another coach that you draft a guy who gets the ball in the end zone or goes after the QB with a top ten pick.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (01-11-2018)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.