Jack Doyle to Test the Market

[Pez]

Originally Posted by DrSpaceman

I don't think we can judge Doyle based on one season under a bad staff and a back up QB starting all season

He has had some down games, but still has made some good plays all season and has been pretty reliable.

...

Agree here, except to say that we should judge each player by how they performed this season, taking those factors into account as well.

I think we saw Doyle do his best to step up and deliver under tough circumstances. Can we say the same thing for Kamar Aiken, or TY Hilton.

Without fear there cannot be courage. If nothing else, this throwaway season is telling us about the players we have across all levels of our roster.

[Brylok]

Originally Posted by Pez

If nothing else, this throwaway season is telling us about the players we have across all levels of our roster.

Not so much with TY and Moncrief. It's hard to grade them when they're playing in Chud's idiotic scheme with a backup QB who is running for his life. And when he isn't running for his life, he has trouble with his progressions and finding receivers down field.

[rcubed]

Originally Posted by Brylok

Not so much with TY and Moncrief. It's hard to grade them when they're playing in Chud's idiotic scheme with a backup QB who is running for his life. And when he isn't running for his life, he has trouble with his progressions and finding receivers down field.

Mostly agree with you. But TY has had some big games with those parameters. I just havent seen moncrief having those impacts. It may be this is what you get with moncrief. I will be interested to see what decision ballard makes with him.

[Pez]

Originally Posted by rcubed

Mostly agree with you. But TY has had some big games with those parameters. I just havent seen moncrief having those impacts. It may be this is what you get with moncrief. I will be interested to see what decision ballard makes with him.

In that same vein, didnt irsay say something about pags' job was not dependent on win-loss record, but rather on player development? I swear I read that somewhere...

Agree it will be Interesting to see if DM is on this team next year.

[1965southpaw]

Originally Posted by Pez

In that same vein, didnt irsay say something about pags' job was not dependent on win-loss record, but rather on player development? I swear I read that somewhere...

Agree it will be Interesting to see if DM is on this team next year.

Don't know about Irsay but I've heard Ballard say this in multiple interviews.

[YDFL Commish]

Originally Posted by rcubed

Mostly agree with you. But TY has had some big games with those parameters. I just havent seen moncrief having those impacts. It may be this is what you get with moncrief. I will be interested to see what decision ballard makes with him.

Also, there were plays that Brisket left on the field. Either the ball came out late, or didn't come out at all. TY left nothing on the field imo.