ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-17-2018, 04:45 PM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 859
Thanks: 337
Thanked 667 Times in 286 Posts
Default

Someone posted on Twitter that PFF gave Darius Leonard a 49 rating for this week's game. If so, that pretty much says it all about PFF. What did Vander Esch get?
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-17-2018, 04:49 PM
Pez Pez is offline
Accidental Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 684 Times in 374 Posts
Default

Wild, 40 bucks a year...
__________________
** 2017 Premier league champion **

"I want to dominate all my opponents, and take their will away to play the game, by each play, and finishing them past the whistle."
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12-17-2018, 09:32 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,668
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
Here is a quick thought or question I should say.

What kind of value could we get by trading Hooker?
Ed Reed he is not, but I don't want to get rid of the kid yet. Maybe he'll flourish in a different system after Eberflus takes a head coach job somewhere.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12-17-2018, 09:34 PM
Luck4Reich's Avatar
Luck4Reich Luck4Reich is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,558
Thanks: 1,988
Thanked 3,108 Times in 1,639 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Someone posted on Twitter that PFF gave Darius Leonard a 49 rating for this week's game. If so, that pretty much says it all about PFF. What did Vander Esch get?
Yeah fuck PFF
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post:
omahacolt (12-17-2018)
  #65  
Old 12-17-2018, 10:30 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,219
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,275 Times in 1,745 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Someone posted on Twitter that PFF gave Darius Leonard a 49 rating for this week's game. If so, that pretty much says it all about PFF. What did Vander Esch get?
A dude on twitter thought I was an idiot because I said a pff ranking wasn’t a stat.

He seriously thought it was the same as say number of yards or catches. Moral of the story, people are stupid.

Have no idea why shrek thinks a pff ranking means something
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-17-2018, 10:33 PM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,219
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,275 Times in 1,745 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChileColts View Post
"Malik Hooker tore the ACL and MCL in his right knee and missed the final 9 games of the season."

Usually take a full season to recover such a big injury....can we wait for next season to see a fully recover ??
But what would that change how he is used? He still won’t want to play run support.
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 12-18-2018, 02:28 AM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,379
Thanks: 1,973
Thanked 2,211 Times in 1,191 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
Someone posted on Twitter that PFF gave Darius Leonard a 49 rating for this week's game. If so, that pretty much says it all about PFF. What did Vander Esch get?
Pancaked by Big Q!
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
bertjones (12-18-2018), Indiana V2 (12-18-2018), Racehorse (12-18-2018), smitty46953 (12-18-2018), southside asshole (12-18-2018)
  #68  
Old 12-18-2018, 07:28 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,878
Thanks: 16,945
Thanked 4,361 Times in 2,508 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
A dude on twitter thought I was an idiot because I said a pff ranking wasn’t a stat.

He seriously thought it was the same as say number of yards or catches. Moral of the story, people are stupid.

Have no idea why shrek thinks a pff ranking means something
Well, you ARE an idiot, but not for that reason.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 12-18-2018, 09:24 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,219
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,275 Times in 1,745 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Well, you ARE an idiot, but not for that reason.
Right. At least be honest about the reasons I am an idiot.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post:
bertjones (12-18-2018), Racehorse (12-18-2018)
  #70  
Old 12-18-2018, 10:01 AM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 859
Thanks: 337
Thanked 667 Times in 286 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
A dude on twitter thought I was an idiot because I said a pff ranking wasn’t a stat.

He seriously thought it was the same as say number of yards or catches. Moral of the story, people are stupid.

Have no idea why shrek thinks a pff ranking means something
That’s funny. For me, it’s the lack of transparency that bugs me about PFF, as well as the presentation of their grades in decimalized format (as if it’s the product of some sophisticated mathematical analysis).

Obviously, there’s nothing wrong with expressing an opinion about a player’s skills and assigning rankings based upon those opinions. We read those types of analyses all the time and decide whether we agree or disagree based upon the information used to support the opinion and our belief about the author’s knowledge and experience.

But I feel like PFF is pretty deceptive in this way. Their rankings are really no different from any other subjective opinion, but unlike most opinions they don’t let you know who is doing the rankings, or how the rankings are achieved. It’s just a giant black box which spits out a numerical grade (always with that extra decimal to trick you into thinking its more objective than it is). So essentially you have no reliable way of judging the merits of their analysis, other than to simply compare it with what you see yourself. But then why do I need PFF? Why would I ever be convinced by anything PFF says if they don't tell me why they are saying it? It’s just a marketing gimmick.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post:
FatDT (12-18-2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.