ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-11-2018, 08:27 AM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,930
Thanks: 1,782
Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,402 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
Them drafting Barkley at 1 is perfect to me. It removes any temptation the Colts might have to draft Barkley at 3, and gives the Colts a 3 team derby in the "trade down and still get Chubb" sweepstakes, adding the Browns to the Broncos and Jets as potential suitors for the 3rd pick, and Cleveland has more draft firepower than either of the other two. I don't see how the Giants don't take their QB of choice in that scenario (Eli is 37 and on the decline, any feigned interest in another player/position is a smokescreen to not be blatantly obvious), so that would leave the Colts at 3 with Chubb and the top 3 QBs on the board, which means you call each of the Browns, Broncos, and Jets and inform them that now is their chance to get their choice QB of the ones left. I think one of them bites and the Colts still get Chubb.
Add the bills in there
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-11-2018, 08:32 AM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
Add the bills in there
Unless I'm missing a trade somewhere the Bills don't have the picks to move up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-11-2018, 08:57 AM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
Unless I'm missing a trade somewhere the Bills don't have the picks to move up.
They can throw in future year's picks can't they?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2018, 11:14 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
Unless I'm missing a trade somewhere the Bills don't have the picks to move up.
By the draft value chart, Bills could move their two firsts, a second, and a third to get roughly equal value to #3.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-11-2018, 11:42 AM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 3,438
Thanks: 2,053
Thanked 2,273 Times in 1,224 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
By the draft value chart, Bills could move their two firsts, a second, and a third to get roughly equal value to #3.
Nope. 21 and 22 are too far back for my liking.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post:
FatDT (03-11-2018), Spike (03-11-2018)
  #6  
Old 03-11-2018, 01:14 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Nope. 21 and 22 are too far back for my liking.
Agreed, the talent likely available all the way in the 20s isn't good enough to justify trading back that far. We will rarely be able to draft players in the top 5. Let's not waste that just to acquire more picks that will not be difference-makers.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-11-2018, 01:44 PM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie being released by the Giants. Dunno how good he still is but any new name on the CB market only helps us.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-11-2018, 01:50 PM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Nope. 21 and 22 are too far back for my liking.
Unless you can then trade back up some, but you have to be sure, otherwise that is too far to move back.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-11-2018, 04:16 PM
Puck's Avatar
Puck Puck is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Fort Wayne
Posts: 7,930
Thanks: 1,782
Thanked 2,853 Times in 1,402 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
Nope. 21 and 22 are too far back for my liking.
But you could combine the 21 and 22 which equal 1580 points and move back up to 7th and keep the 2nd and 3rd from Bills this yr and their 1st next yr and take Nelson
__________________
Gonna win it all.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Puck For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (03-11-2018)
  #10  
Old 03-11-2018, 04:41 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,074
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,665 Times in 964 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Puck View Post
But you could combine the 21 and 22 which equal 1580 points and move back up to 7th and keep the 2nd and 3rd from Bills this yr and their 1st next yr and take Nelson
The Bucs aren't trading back that far if the Colts do, they'll be smart, stay put, and get Chubb. That's why the Colts can't trade back past 7.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.