ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 04-17-2021, 03:17 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 3,610 Times in 2,021 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
^^^ I got the sense we didnt go after those DL free agents mostly due to the contracts that would come with them.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’m starting to wonder if we have money problems.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 04-17-2021, 03:19 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,015
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,608 Times in 934 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
I’m starting to wonder if we have money problems.
That's a valid concern when they're so far under the cap and can't beat 2/$16 for someone as productive as Ngakoue and they have a desperate need at the position.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 04-17-2021, 03:25 PM
TheMugwump's Avatar
TheMugwump TheMugwump is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,805
Thanks: 1,611
Thanked 1,556 Times in 884 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
First round CB with no trade down is pretty much a nightmare scenario, and the same could be said for any position other than OT and EDGE at 21. That said, I think the recent resigning of T.J. Carrie combined with the earlier resigning of Xavier Rhodes indicates that CB is not a position they'll target early in the draft.
When did Carrie get re-signed? I missed that.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 04-17-2021, 03:29 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,015
Thanks: 102
Thanked 1,608 Times in 934 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMugwump View Post
When did Carrie get re-signed? I missed that.
I saw something about it last night. Don't remember where.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post:
TheMugwump (04-17-2021)
  #195  
Old 04-17-2021, 04:30 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMugwump View Post
When did Carrie get re-signed? I missed that.
https://forums.colts.com/topic/70405...-carrie-merge/

Don't know how accurate this is, I didn't see much anywhere else.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
JAFF (04-17-2021)
  #196  
Old 04-17-2021, 04:50 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

Kenny Moore confirmed it yesterday. BuT TJ Carrie himself confirmed it. This is great news. Now, go get that Offensive tackle and edge rusher. So damn excited for this year!
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
TheMugwump (04-17-2021)
  #197  
Old 04-17-2021, 04:54 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

I think, outside of the Bills, we are the one team that can kick the Chiefs ass and make it to the SB. My one dream scenario, is that we meet the Bucs in the SB and kick Tom Brady's ass. IMO, that will let me die one ass happy camper.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 04-17-2021, 05:11 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,059
Thanks: 2,388
Thanked 2,514 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
I’m starting to wonder if we have money problems.
Why? The TV money covers the cap. Isnt there a cap floor that all teams must cover? If the Colts cant do that, I might believe they have money problems.

You guys just cant out guess Chris Ballard.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Spike (04-17-2021)
  #199  
Old 04-17-2021, 06:21 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
Why? The TV money covers the cap. Isnt there a cap floor that all teams must cover? If the Colts cant do that, I might believe they have money problems.

You guys just cant out guess Chris Ballard.
I agree! The Irsay's have donated 4 million to charity, doesn't sound like a money problem to me. I have said this before, I wouldn't trade Irsay for any other owner in the league. He has the money, Ballard is just being smarter than most of the other GM's. He isn't overpaying for mediocre to average talent. I was one who was on the sign Carl Lawson bandwagon, but he was the only one I kinda wish Ballard would have signed. But for his production, not sure he was worth 15 million per year for 3 years. He is good, but not dominant. Ballard is one smart SOB.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
JAFF (04-17-2021), Racehorse (04-17-2021)
  #200  
Old 04-17-2021, 06:40 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 7,710
Thanks: 8,127
Thanked 4,793 Times in 2,672 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
I thought about creating a separate positional rankings thread for the 2021 NFL Draft, but I don't know that anyone else is crazy enough to have invested too many hours of their time for no payoff other than forming their own opinions about draft prospects. Anyway, I wanted to put a couple of my own (admittedly somewhat fluid) positional rankings out there. These are in no way comprehensive (for example, I've only watched the top 5 QBs. I have no opinion on Kellen Mond at present), just my rankings based on who I've watched along with analysis. I'm only doing QB and OT for now (and only QB in this post), as those are the two positions I've watched the most (I might do DE/Edge at some point, but I haven't watched enough players at the position yet to form a cogent ranking. If I find time to watch 5-10 more players between now and the draft, maybe, but that's unlikely), and I'm also going to include a section on what I value at these positions, so that hopefully my rankings make more sense. For example, my ranking of Trevor Lawrence is entirely about what I value in QBs, and I could certainly see why another person who values different attributes might rank him differently. So, without further ado:

Positional Rankings

QB
What I value at QB: Accuracy, anticipation throws, and ball placement are the top 3 traits for a QB to be successful in the NFL in my opinion. Accuracy is about the QB delivering a catchable ball on any given throw. Anticipation throws are about throwing the ball when the QB sees an indicator that his receiver is going to be open in a window, trusting his receiver to get open in that window, and starting the throw to that window 1-2 seconds before the receiver actually comes open. Ball placement is about the QB throwing the ball where the receiver is the only player who can make a play on the ball. If he doesn't get it, no one will. I also highly value the ability to make plays off-script, especially when that ability primarily translates into chunk pass plays, or turning potentially negative pass plays into positive ones. This is the ability of the QB to, when the play breaks down, use his athleticism and pocket mobility to buy time, allow his receivers to come open, and make throws that in some cases are very difficult to make, but result in positive plays for the offense. These are the plays that frustrate and demoralize an opposing defense. Finally, I like athleticism in a QB, but I view running frequently as a QB as a negative trait. The reasons are twofold: first, this behavior significantly increases the chance of injury, thereby likely decreasing the career length of the QB in question, and second, a QB who runs frequently is likely a QB who isn't going through all of his progressions and is bailing out on a play at the first sign of trouble. That second point is a recipe for long term failure in the NFL.

Rankings
1) Zach Wilson, BYU: I believe that Wilson has Patrick Mahomes level potential, but is also more NFL ready today than Mahomes was in 2017. I also believe he is going to a Jets team that currently has a lot of building blocks in place and is going to add 4 top 100 players in this draft outside of Wilson. Put on tape of Zach Wilson, and you will see a clinic in the positive traits I listed above. He is incredibly accurate, displays good anticipation, and has great ball placement, especially on deep throws. In that tape you will also see him frequently facing pressure, having to adapt, and make off script throws, and typically he makes this look easy. The biggest negatives I see in him are that sometimes he'll get too cute trying to make off-script plays, such as trying to do the no-look pass stuff (I don't even like when Mahomes does that, but it's hard to argue with results), and at times he trusts his arm too much and tries to fit balls into very tight windows (though this works out more often than not, so, again, hard to argue with results). Barring injury, I see Wilson's ceiling as a top 10 NFL starting QB, with a floor of a high quality backup.

2) Mac Jones, Alabama: Considering the current rumors about the third overall pick, it seems that perhaps Kyle Shanahan is seeing what I'm seeing here. The 49ers are currently the best situation for a rookie QB to walk into, and if they select Mac Jones, I believe he will look like the best of the bunch in 2021 because of this. Mac Jones is the most pro ready QB I've seen since Andrew Luck. His accuracy and ball placement rivals Joe Burrow's (who didn't get knocked for playing with Justin Jefferson, Ja'Marr Chase, Terrance Marshall, and Clyde Edwards-Helaire), and his anticipation is by far the best I've ever seen from a college QB. He's on par with high end NFL veteran starting QBs in anticipation throws. The common knocks on him include surrounding talent (see notes on Joe Burrow above), arm strength and athleticism. Regarding the latter two, I see this as an opportunity rather than a weakness. Jones's pocket mobility is sufficient for when a play breaks down, he can make off-script plays and keep his offense moving, but it is very clear that he did not, as of the night of the national championship game, have an NFL body. To me, this means that he performed at a near optimal level with suboptimal conditioning. Putting him in an NFL strength and conditioning program is an opportunity to give him the arm strength and perhaps even some of the athleticism he lacks, which could even make him better than Wilson. With Jones, I see the floor as a #20-25 NFL starting QB with the ceiling being Top 10 starting NFL QB, barring injury of course.

3) Justin Fields, OSU: Justin Fields is a high upside talent with a high bust factor (a common theme of he and the next 2 QBs). Unfortunately at the present time, it's very unclear where he will end up, which makes it harder to project him as a player, as situation is a very important factor. Fields typically displays good accuracy and good ball placement, but struggles at times with anticipation and can be fooled by disguises from a defense (see: Indiana tape). Fields's athleticism is off the charts, and his ability to make off-script plays is very good, but too often he does it by becoming a runner, which creates a much higher injury risk as a concern. I think Fields will come much closer to ceiling than floor with a good developmental coaching staff and a redshirt year. In my opinion, Fields's floor is out of the league in 4 years, and his ceiling is Top 10 NFL starting QB.

4) Trevor Lawrence, Clemson: This is likely to be the most controversial of my rankings, but I will stand by it whether he hits ceiling or not. I've watched A LOT of Clemson tape to come to this conclusion, and the problem I have with the projections I see of Lawrence is that I see an incredibly significant bust factor in him for which I don't think people are accounting. Quite honestly, of the three traits I listed that were most important in my evaluation, for me Lawrence was lacking in both accuracy and anticipation, and possibly above average in ball placement. He missed open receivers and missed open windows far too often because he wasn't starting the throw at the right time, he wasn't putting the ball in the right place, or he was throwing to the wrong read. Lawrence's anticipation is awful at present, and to me, he is much more of an example of benefiting from talent around him than Mac Jones. He also struggled off-script, and made a lot of his best plays with his legs, which will increase the chance of injury. It also doesn't help that he's going to what appears to be the second worst organization in the NFL (the worst being the Texans as long as Jack Easterby is around) on a roster that is relatively bereft of talent. Lawrence would benefit greatly from sitting a year and learning, but with the situation he's being thrust into, that's an impossibility. It's a testament to Lawrence's athletic gifts, character, and displayed on-field perseverance that I have him ranked ahead of Lance. Expect Lawrence to struggle in Year 1, and it's very possible that the Jaguars will ruin him. Floor for Lawrence is Ryan Leaf level bust, and ceiling is Peyton Manning level success.

5) Trey Lance, NDSU: Trey Lance is the biggest example of how valued ceiling becomes in the NFL draft. If you watch his tape, you can convince yourself he's a first round pick based on it. He's accurate, has good ball placement, and makes the occasional good anticipation throw, though he rarely has to call upon it. He also makes plays off-script well, but uses his legs too often to do that, making injuries a concern. Of course with Lance, level of competition is a concern, as NDSU is an FCS school, and it makes you wonder how well he would do if his receivers weren't so wide open and he had to throw into tighter windows. Alternatively, there is the intriguing upside of Lance's age, being that he will be 21 at the start of the 2021 season. Again, it is unclear where Lance will end up, but I think both Lance and whatever team gets him would be best served by sitting him for at least 1 and possibly even 2 seasons. Lance's floor is out of the league in 4 years and his ceiling is Top 10 starting NFL QB.
Uh, no. Lawrence is the number 1 QB, period. My only question about him is that he is kinda like Luck. Football may not be is primary focus in life based on his latest statements. But you can't tell me that he is lower than any of these other 4 QB's talent wise. He is a generational talent and I watched a lot of Clemson games, I can't say that about any of the other 4 QB's. Every GM in the league would take Lawrence 1st and that is just not debatable, and they are a hell of a lot smarter than me and you. The only way I see him busting is because he goes to the Jackoffs and they fucking ruin him. Outside of the Texans, they are the worst run franchise in the league. But that's ok, love to see it.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.

Last edited by Spike; 04-17-2021 at 06:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.