#141
|
||||
|
||||
Adam SchefterVerified account @AdamSchefter
Le’Veon Bell: 4 years, $52.5 million with the Jets, per source.
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
#142
|
||||
|
||||
For fucks sake. Maybe we would have had to pay more as mentioned, but seriously!? Come on man.
|
#143
|
||||
|
||||
I'm not convinced he would've done well as a hand-down DE.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FatDT For This Useful Post: | ||
smitty46953 (03-13-2019) |
#145
|
||||
|
||||
It also bears mentioning that as a part of that trade, the 49ers signed him to a five-year, $87.5MM contract ($17.5M average annual value) with $45 million in guarantees. So you'd need to be okay with doing that as well if you're going to complain about the Colts failure to make this move. Not saying its a bad or good deal, since I don't know a whole lot about Dee Ford, but just that the financial aspects of these kind of deals are often ignored and the focus is only on the draft pick compensation.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Chaka For This Useful Post: | ||
Spike (03-13-2019) |
#146
|
||||
|
||||
Not at that salary, not worth the gamble that he can play in a 4-3 …
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to smitty46953 For This Useful Post: | ||
Spike (03-13-2019), VeveJones007 (03-13-2019) |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
I read that KC thought he was a bad fit for the 4-3 they are changing to. We are "losing" the off season. Good. Its a rare duck that "wins" the off season and repeats in the real season. Keep doing what you're doing Ballard (although Luck to Beckham would have been a sight to see-I understand not having 50-60 million tied up in your qb and top two recievers)
|
#148
|
|||
|
|||
I don't know that I would've wanted the Colts to give him that salary had he hit the open market.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dam8610 For This Useful Post: | ||
Oldcolt (03-13-2019), VeveJones007 (03-13-2019) |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
But it wasn't just a 2020 2nd. It was a 2020 2nd + a 5 year $87.5MM contract. That changes the risk calculus.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post: | ||
#150
|
|||
|
|||
That, and we already know he can't play the run very well, too. As much pissing and moaning as there is in the Funchess thread, that's a one year deal and all they lose is some of the abundance of cap space. That deal for Ford would have been awful.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post: | ||
Oldcolt (03-13-2019) |
|
|