ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-17-2023, 09:36 AM
Ironshaft Ironshaft is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 410
Thanks: 1,303
Thanked 795 Times in 270 Posts
Default

It is a catch 22.

The Colts would be foolish in the extreme in choosing to pay JT more money prior to seeing if he is still the back that he was pre-injury.

My guess is that JT will not want to play at all until he is guarenteed more money.

Which side breaks first?
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ironshaft For This Useful Post:
JAFF (08-17-2023), Oldcolt (08-17-2023)
  #22  
Old 08-17-2023, 11:31 AM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,669
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironshaft View Post
It is a catch 22.

The Colts would be foolish in the extreme in choosing to pay JT more money prior to seeing if he is still the back that he was pre-injury.

My guess is that JT will not want to play at all until he is guarenteed more money.

Which side breaks first?
I'd just waive him if it gets to that point. Having him would help Richardson, sure. But odds are we're going to stink while Richardson learns. Other RBs are out there. Don't need a cancer around.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Brylok For This Useful Post:
Ironshaft (08-17-2023)
  #23  
Old 08-17-2023, 09:42 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,211
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,250 Times in 1,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brylok View Post
I'd just waive him if it gets to that point. Having him would help Richardson, sure. But odds are we're going to stink while Richardson learns. Other RBs are out there. Don't need a cancer around.
Zero upsides in waiving him, let him hold out, he doesn't get paid and doesn't accrue a year towards unrestricted free agency.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Butter For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (08-17-2023), Racehorse (08-18-2023)
  #24  
Old 08-17-2023, 10:05 PM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is online now
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,340
Thanks: 1,437
Thanked 3,676 Times in 2,055 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironshaft View Post
It is a catch 22.

The Colts would be foolish in the extreme in choosing to pay JT more money prior to seeing if he is still the back that he was pre-injury.

My guess is that JT will not want to play at all until he is guarenteed more money.

Which side breaks first?
I wouldn't offer him anything till
A: He gets healthy and shows he is healthy.
B: Is willing to show he will play and play hard.

I don't know who is going to trade for him AND then pay him top dollar when he is hurt and completely toxic.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-18-2023, 06:31 AM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,599
Thanks: 233
Thanked 984 Times in 484 Posts
Default

There should be a compromise solution between trade me and sign me long term. Something to make him okay with playing this year. I'd offer him a bonus for this year and a promise to give him a decent second contract or trade him if he proves he's still a solid RB. I hated losing Faulk and I'd hate losing Taylor.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-18-2023, 07:17 AM
ChaosTheory's Avatar
ChaosTheory ChaosTheory is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 497
Thanked 1,649 Times in 790 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albany ed View Post
There should be a compromise solution between trade me and sign me long term. Something to make him okay with playing this year. I'd offer him a bonus for this year and a promise to give him a decent second contract or trade him if he proves he's still a solid RB. I hated losing Faulk and I'd hate losing Taylor.
We'd all hate to lose Taylor, but he can't do this shit.

There's already a compromise between trade me and sign me long term... play out your fucking contract for $4.3m.

You don't give a kid extra cherries on his sundae for cleaning his room because he's threatening to throw a shit fit in public.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ChaosTheory For This Useful Post:
JAFF (08-18-2023)
  #27  
Old 08-18-2023, 12:32 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,669
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
Zero upsides in waiving him, let him hold out, he doesn't get paid and doesn't accrue a year towards unrestricted free agency.
You then risk having an angry malcontent hanging around the locker room poisoning the minds of the other players and causing a huge distraction. I'd waive him before I'd allow that to happen. Just my opinion though.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-18-2023, 04:00 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,103
Thanks: 297
Thanked 738 Times in 411 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brylok View Post
You then risk having an angry malcontent hanging around the locker room poisoning the minds of the other players and causing a huge distraction. I'd waive him before I'd allow that to happen. Just my opinion though.
Only thing worse than him poisoning the locker room would be to give in and teach players if you aren’t happy with your contract make a big deal about it and we’ll let you out of it. Team needs to be both fair and firm. They aren’t screwing JT, so let him whine. If they franchise him next year and never offer a reasonable contract then I may have sympathy for JT. Until then, he needs to shut the fuck up and show why he’s supposedly worth all the money he wants. And if he wants to be a cancer, send his ass home to sit. But you don’t reward him by waiving him.
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
Brylok (08-18-2023), Chromeburn (08-18-2023), Racehorse (08-18-2023), YDFL Commish (08-19-2023)
  #29  
Old 08-18-2023, 04:41 PM
Brylok's Avatar
Brylok Brylok is offline
"Still at Work"
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 7,669
Thanks: 2,311
Thanked 3,036 Times in 1,865 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
But you don’t reward him by waiving him.
I agree with you, but I'm of the idea that if he's on the waiver wire, he'll find out from 31 other teams that he's actually worth around $8-10M tops. Nowhere near the $16M he wants now. Maybe he'd come back down to Earth.

Worst thing the Colts could do is cave in and pay him.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.