#41
|
|||
|
|||
How about that intentional grounding call?
It didn't seem to matter in the end, but what a load of shit that was. If that is grounding now, then any time the QB is under pressure and alters his throw as a result it would be grounding. TY was WIDE open, I believe, there is no way he would have intentionally grounded that play |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DrSpaceman For This Useful Post: | ||
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Refs fucked the Browns too. Tired of those bastards determining the outcome of games. It could easily be fixed by having someone in the booth overturning these dumb ass calls. I don't understand the rule that some calls are not reviewable. And the refs need to swallow their whistles and let a play go, then review it. Fuck the apology, that does nothing for the team or the fans.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
The Following User Says Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post: | ||
Chromeburn (10-02-2018) |
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Even if Watt didn't hit the ball or Luck's arm to alter the throw on that grounding call, Luck still had another defender tackling him at his legs, preventing him from stepping into the throw. So either way I don't see how it could be grounding if contact from a defensive player alters a throw. This would mean that anytime a defender hits a QBs arm as its moving forward, knocks the ball out and the ball travels just a few feet and hits the ground, not making it back to the line of scrimmage or in the vicinity of an eligible receiver, then it would be intentional grounding.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to HoosierinFL For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (10-02-2018) |
|
|