#51
|
|||
|
|||
None of those statistics makes the author's conjecture that he cited as a statistic anything more than conjecture.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Eh, most of the close games the team has lost have been a result of a costly turnover at the wrong time from our young developing QB. I'd call it growing pains more than anything, which is exactly what you'd expect from a team that needed a great deal of its roster overhauled.
|
#53
|
||||
|
||||
Stats are relevant? I never knew. What data would you accept as evidence? A proclamation from God?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#54
|
||||
|
||||
If I worked for this organization and didn't care about having a job tomorrow I'd tape this post to the office doors of Irsay (not that he can read), Ballard and Pagano (not that he can read).
|
#55
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But man, you hold on to and argue the most inane points. You arent even arguing what he was trying to say, you are just arguing about a word. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post: | ||
#56
|
||||
|
||||
He loves to argue, proved him wrong once in old days when I gave a shit and he never posted in that thread again. Often seen arguing with inanimate objects such as stop signs etc ...
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!! |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to smitty46953 For This Useful Post: | ||
#57
|
||||
|
||||
He is best tuned out, too bad always felt like he was intelligent and had a lot to offer, but with all this Pagano shit he has proven that wrong. Best ignored.
|
#58
|
||||
|
||||
Pretty much has zero credibility. Too much of a pussy to admit he was wrong
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to YDFL Commish For This Useful Post: | ||
ChoppedWood (11-18-2017), Racehorse (11-18-2017) |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
There's been some talk that we are going to evolve to a viewing experience where you will be able to assign your viewing preference to specific players where a camera will basically ISO them for you in a corner of the screen in a split screen / red zone type experience (for a premium price of course) (Thursday night's telecast with the whole game in "sky view" was one of the first steps in this regard- which I hated by the way).
Imagine if you will a sort of DraftKings roster display where fans get to pick the player they want their game focused on. You'd have a list that would start at the top with: Brady= 457,638 Total viewers / 387,653 MA / 28,265 NY, 13,543 CA...etc Rodgers= 398,543 Total viewers / 298,435 WI / 64,342 MN / 23,459 IL...etc Brown= 287,543 Total viewers / 267,543 PA / 16,543 WV...etc and on down the list of star players in the NFL who make the game fun to watch... You could then scroll to the bottom...At the very bottom of the list... Pagano= 1 / 1 IN ...and there every week would reside Dam with his custom ordered Colts stitched jersey with the number of 1 and "Pagano" proudly displayed on the back cheering at full throat every time there was a clapping session and coming out of his seat with each and every challenge flag thrown! I suspect bodily fluid tissue moments would ensue each time there was a mysteriously ill timed time out called and his custom camera focused on Chuck calling the ref's over to discuss if it was a shooting foul or if it was called on the floor... |
The Following User Says Thank You to ChoppedWood For This Useful Post: | ||
Racehorse (11-18-2017) |
|
|