#1
|
||||
|
||||
And Cheater fans everywhere go....uh oh.....
Not because the Cheaters lost.....at home.....on opening night........
Not because their defense got lit up like a Christmas tree....... Not because the wonder twin boys of Allen and Dorsett combined for 0 yards on 0 catches...... But, because Tommy Cheater had Scott Tolzien like numbers in the game. Quarter 1 = 7 completions / 11 attempts / 093 yards / 0 TD / 0 INT Quarter 2 = 2 completions / 06 attempts / 038 yards / 0 TD / 0 INT Quarter 3 = 4 completions / 09 attempts / 101 yards / 0 TD / 0 INT Quarter 4 = 3 completions / 10 attempts / 037 yards / 0 TD / 0 INT 16 completions / 36 attempts / 267 yards / 0 TD / 0 INT Okay, that is a bit of a stretch. He did not have Tolzien type numbers because I don't think that Tolzien can go 7 of 11 for 93 yards like Tommy Cheater did in the 1st quarter. Tommy Cheater is the largest factor in the Cheats being relevant. Yes, Bellicheat is an excellent coach when he is not cheating but Tommy has been able to deliver the goods time and time and time again when needed. He came up way, way short last night. Granted, once KC got up and the Cheats needed to press, their pass rush got pretty vicious but that does not explain a 2 for 6 2nd quarter or a 4 for 9 3rd quarter. He had "ham sandwich eating time" in the pocket in the 2nd quarter without pressure. Something to keep an eye on but if Tommy Cheater is slowing down and falling off a cliff, then that is great news for the rest of the NFL. Walk Worthy,
__________________
============== Thad The future is so bright; I gotta triple up! |
The Following User Says Thank You to sherck For This Useful Post: | ||
1965southpaw (09-08-2017) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
They kept trying to go long to Cooks and he didn't hit it much.
Bad throw to Allen on the first play. Allen and Dorsett had zero impact on the game, even after Amendola went out |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
As much as I despise Tom Brady i will never count him out, dude always finds a way to overcome. This was just the first game of a long season, I'm sure with more practice and game time with Cooks, Allen, and Dorsett, Brady will be putting up big numbers again.
__________________
Irsay and Ballard got the Reich guy! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Stunned that Kareem Hunt torched the Patriots for 148 yards rushing, almost 100 passing and 3 tds...
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pez For This Useful Post: | ||
Mr. Session (09-08-2017) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
They will figure it out with more time to prepare, set the roster better, and watch opposing teams' practice tapes.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by sherck; 09-08-2017 at 01:22 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to njcoltfan For This Useful Post: | ||
kitekrazy (09-10-2017) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Brady wasn't very good. I thought it was just rust but he consistently overthrew receivers the entire game.
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Counting last night, in the last seven seasons, the Pats have only lost by two TDs four times. Chiefs, Bills, Chiefs, Browns.
The team is so good I can see how the rest of the AFC might find it morally deflating. Fuck the Patriots. Just for fun... Browns: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJD_bB-hLmo Chiefs (2014): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTrLMeSfpeE Bills (2016, vs brissett at QB, Jerry Huges sack at 1:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f0Ha-d9zMM Last edited by Pez; 09-08-2017 at 12:11 PM. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pez For This Useful Post: | ||
smitty46953 (09-08-2017), Spike (09-08-2017) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I disagree
Get rid of Brady and you have a small let down. Belicheat is why they are successful |
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post: | ||
1965southpaw (09-08-2017), Butter (09-08-2017), Colts And Orioles (09-08-2017), Coltsalr (09-10-2017), kitekrazy (09-10-2017), Racehorse (09-08-2017), rcubed (09-09-2017), YDFL Commish (09-08-2017) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What?! Impossible! These were such huge personnel losses for the Colts, how could they possibly have not made an impact?!
|
|
|