#131
|
||||
|
||||
Why were all of you so silent with Hillary's criminal activity? What about Obama ?
It wouldnt have matter to most of you who was president as long as it wan't a republican
__________________
Gonna win it all. |
#132
|
||||
|
||||
|
#133
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So yea, I see what you are saying, some people are just ANTI people. If a republican thought of it it's a horrible idea, and part of the obvious right wing conspiracy. Look to Mitch McConnel? Wasnt it the day after the inaguration that he said he wanted Obama to fail and wanted his single most important goal to be to make Obama a one term president? How about Donald Trump himself riding the birth certificate train? Are these the actions of people who want America to succeed? Like I've posted on McConnel's twitter a hundred times: Galations 6:7 "Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows" |
#134
|
||||
|
||||
it would depend on the republican. i would have no problem voting for a republican if he werent a racist, religiously bigoted, dickwad
|
#135
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#136
|
|||
|
|||
Nowadays...its all about whether they have a D or an R after their name......
|
#137
|
|||
|
|||
If there was a Republican that represented my political ideology, I'd vote for that person. The likelihood of that happening is roughly the same as the likelihood of the Cleveland Browns winning the Super Bowl next year. Party doesn't really matter to me, ideology does, but the way things are structured currently, ideology and party are very closely tied to one another.
|
#138
|
|||
|
|||
No; Trump transcends that. C'mon. You really don't think the reaction would be the same if he identified as Democrat? He's a unique case of trainwreck.
|
#139
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#140
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
To put it another way, if someone has like 2-3 beers or whatever and they have a BAC of, say, 0.08 or so they are impaired but enough to mask it. If they drank the whole 12 pack and their BAC is at, say, 0.16 or whatever it becomes more difficult. Same with weed, though there isn't as precise a test to measure active THC levels as opposed to BAC. While both drugs can have negative effects on a person, I struggle to see how an objective person can say that they are equal. Alcohol is a CNS depressant, and by its nature it makes it impairs motor function. It's why drunk driving is so dangerous compared to almost any other drug. It's hard to operate machinery when your own machinery doesn't operate well. From a more anecdotal POV, alcohol tends to bring out the violence in people I almost never see with weed. I think most people agree with that. I mean, look at the Parry thread. "He stole a golf cart and punched a guy? What the fuck is his problem? Oh, he was drunk? That explains it." On your general point (I think) I agree that both need to be regulated. |
|
|