ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-21-2019, 12:05 AM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
They did, see Funchess.
No I said someone, not a nobody.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-21-2019, 06:33 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 17,010
Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,519 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
No I said someone, not a nobody.
Dude had sCam Newton throwing the ball. Maybe he isn't a nobody but had a clown at QB which limited him.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-21-2019, 06:43 AM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
Dude had sCam Newton throwing the ball. Maybe he isn't a nobody but had a clown at QB which limited him.
Maybe, and he could also just suck.

Do you consider the number 2 WR position solved with that signing?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:21 AM
omahacolt's Avatar
omahacolt omahacolt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 8,230
Thanks: 1,450
Thanked 4,282 Times in 1,750 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
Maybe, and he could also just suck.

Do you consider the number 2 WR position solved with that signing?
I don’t
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:11 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maniac View Post
Maybe, and he could also just suck.

Do you consider the number 2 WR position solved with that signing?
Funchess fits a particular role--he'll beat press and move the chains in specific situations. I don't think that role rises to the classification as WR2, but it's something the team sorely needed.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
apballin (03-21-2019)
  #46  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:32 AM
FatDT's Avatar
FatDT FatDT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,252
Thanks: 314
Thanked 1,099 Times in 497 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Funchess fits a particular role--he'll beat press and move the chains in specific situations. I don't think that role rises to the classification as WR2, but it's something the team sorely needed.
The team sorely needs a WR2, and that's it. Either Funchess is that guy or it was a bad signing.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:44 AM
Maniac's Avatar
Maniac Maniac is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Home
Posts: 1,772
Thanks: 782
Thanked 1,304 Times in 712 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
The team sorely needs a WR2, and that's it. Either Funchess is that guy or it was a bad signing.
Yep. I hope he pans out to be that, but right now I'm skeptical. I don't think he's the type of talent that makes you feel "ok, now we're set there, so the focus can be elsewhere in the draft." I think they still need to look at drafting a WR.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:03 AM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
The team sorely needs a WR2, and that's it. Either Funchess is that guy or it was a bad signing.
To be honest, this team needs a WR2/3/4 (Inman would be fine as WR4, but he’s not signed and Cain could be any one of those but that’s certainly far from proven).

So if Funchess fills any of those roles admirably AND the Colts manage to fill WR2/3 admirably (say, Cain and a rookie draft pick) then I’ll call Funchess a good signing at WR4, albeit a highly overpaid one (which, with the cap space we have, who cares?)

That said, if Funchess comes in and is expected to be WR2 and nothing else is done to address the position then my initial reaction to the signing will be correct and he’ll be the next Ryan Grant/Andre Johnson/Hakeem Nicks/DHB/Donnie Avery.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 03-21-2019, 10:50 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT View Post
The team sorely needs a WR2, and that's it. Either Funchess is that guy or it was a bad signing.
You’re talking ambiguous concepts and I’m talking tactics.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:08 AM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,551
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

I disagree we need WR2. We need playmakers on offense, doesn't matter where they line up. Nobody here has the slightest idea of how Funchess will pan out. The folks that know the absolute most signed him for some 13 million. For the first time in eons I'm watching leadership that actually has an idea of how they want to build a team and are following it. They seem, so far, to be able to identify players that fit this scheme and sign them. The proof is what they put on the field. The administration of this team has earned my trust.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.