#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What you’re saying here is dumb. Losing Hooker is in no way a good thing for the colts. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Hoopsdoc For This Useful Post: | ||
Puck (09-22-2020) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Hooker was never Ed Reed and he never will be he’s more like idrees bashir so yea no big loss
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
How available has he been in the last three years? I wont argue talent, but he hasnt been available.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
That is clearly something you don’t know. You think it is unfathomable that Blackmon or Odum can’t upgrade what hooker gave us? You have a much higher opinion of hooker than he deserves
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If the Colts thought Blackmon was already better, he would have been starting. You’re letting your dislike of Hooker affect your reasoning. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Hooker was always going to start over Blackmon, just because Blackmon is recovering from his injury and was on a pitch count.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I get that you guys hate Hooker. But losing him hurts the team. It sure as hell isn't a positive. Last edited by Hoopsdoc; 09-22-2020 at 01:03 PM. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, it sucks. Yes there are aspects of it that are not fair at all. Jim Irsay has paid Malik Hooker $14.6 million to see if he would work out. It just didn't.
__________________
** 2017 Premier league champion ** "I want to dominate all my opponents, and take their will away to play the game, by each play, and finishing them past the whistle." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|