Anthony Castonzo Retiring?

[Brylok]

Ballard is addressing the media right now and has confirmed the return.

[Racehorse]

Originally Posted by Brylok

Ballard is addressing the media right now and has confirmed the return.

Time to change the thread title to Returning!!!

[Butter]

That is a relief,

[Discflinger]

Still love to draft a T high(2 or 3), put him at RT, allowing Braden to serve RG/T depth.

[Maniac]

Originally Posted by Discflinger

Still love to draft a T high(2 or 3), put him at RT, allowing Braden to serve RG/T depth.

too many other needs. They can address it late, but not a high pick hopefully.

[Chromeburn]

Originally Posted by Discflinger

Still love to draft a T high(2 or 3), put him at RT, allowing Braden to serve RG/T depth.

I like Smith there. I think he did a good job. I would rather upgrade the LG position which is easier to do than find a RT.

[Butter]

Originally Posted by Chromeburn

I like Smith there. I think he did a good job. I would rather upgrade the LG position which is easier to do than find a RT.

The only way I go T now is one we can develop to eventually replace AC since it sounds like we are looking year to year with him now.

[rm1369]

Originally Posted by Butter

The only way I go T now is one we can develop to eventually replace AC since it sounds like we are looking year to year with him now.

OT is still 3rd on the priority list for me at 13 - behind QB and DT.

[Puck]

Originally Posted by Chromeburn

I like Smith there. I think he did a good job. I would rather upgrade the LG position which is easier to do than find a RT.

I assume you meant RG

[Chaka]

Interesting development. Makes me wonder what would motivate Castonzo to first float the idea of a retirement, and then decide to return, but only on a year-to-year basis. Trying to read the tea leaves here.

Maybe it's as simple as a desire to earn a few more bucks before retirement, but I have to think that the Colts made some sort of sales pitch to him to convince him to return. If so, what would that pitch have been? We're planning on drafting a developmental QB and you can block for him? I wouldn't think that would be too enticing unless he gets paid really well. We're planning on bringing in a proven vet QB and will have a legit shot at the playoffs? Seems more appealing.

So, do you think this moves the needle closer to the possibility of bringing in a vet QB? Or do you think it's more simple, and just about Castonzo not being ready to let the game go so deciding to play one more season?