#31
|
|||
|
|||
La Canfora says the Colts are interested in moving back up into the late 1st round. Getting that extra year of control is pretty big for certain players.
Quote:
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
I believe the opposite of whatever La Canfora says.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Ballard said he would consider it in his presser yesterday.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm guessing Miami, Buffalo, and Arizona. I still think we're looking at 4 QBs in the top 5. I just hope Barkley is the non-QB who goes off the board before the Colts pick. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Buffalo has the draft capital to get it done this year, so if it includes a future first I’d suspect Miami or Arizona.
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Schefter says the Broncos are shopping #5.
Hope for Barkley at 2 and trades for QBs. Chubb would fall in Ballard’s lap. |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
According to Vic Tafur of The Athletic, the Oakland Raiders "would strongly consider" moving up from No. 10 if Chubb is still available at five or six. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
You’d likely get either Smith or Edmunds at 10.
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Apparently the Packers are interested in moving up from 14, too.
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, I think that’s right. TB goes DB, Bears go Nelson.
I wonder what Oakland would offer. |
|
|