#11
|
|||
|
|||
You really only need one of them to draft other than QB.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Those Buffalo picks are just too late in the 1st IMO. One blue chip player is worth a few solid starters/contributors. But if the Colts don't actually like the top end talent in this draft then maybe it would make sense. I'd rather be in the 10-12 range at most though.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FatDT For This Useful Post: | ||
DrSpaceman (01-31-2018) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
So alex smith is traded to WAS. That puts cousins on the market which could throw a big wrench in the draft. What if CLE signs cousins and takes barkley or chubb #1. Or he could sign with one of the other possible trade partners taking them out of play
Last edited by rcubed; 01-31-2018 at 01:08 PM. |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
My vote is quality (blue chip) vs. quantity (just a guy). We have plenty of guys on this team and I think they will all perform better with better coaching and schemes that are more than "coloring book" schemes - credit Venturi. What we don't have (except for Luck) are those play-makers that transcend scheme and coaching..........That's what we need, especially now that the AFC south has gotten competitive. We are not going to compete with more JAGs.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Trading down to low 20s, even if its two picks, not worth it. Would still want a top 15 pick if trading down. Otherwise you wasted this season and the best opportunity in years to get a franchise impact player |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
In this scenario, let's say the Broncos or Jets pick up Cousins in the coming weeks.
We trade 1:3 (2200 point value) to the Bills for 1:21, 1:22, 2:53, 2:56. (2290) Then we trade 1:21 + 1:22 (1580) to move up to the Broncos/Jets 1:5 or 1:6 pick. (1600) Moving back only 2-3 spots and gaining 2, 2nd round picks.... We also have picks 2:36 (540), 3:67 (255), 4:100 (100), 5:131 (41), 6:164 (27), and 7:195 (14) to perhaps add to either trade to increase interest....that being said our track record of keeping players healthy means we should try stockpiling as many picks as possible. I'm guessing with 1:5/1:6 we could still get Chubb, Nelson, or Fitz We would then have the following picks: 1:6 2:36 2:53 2:56 3:67 4:100 5:131 6:164 7:195 Last edited by Wyatt; 01-31-2018 at 02:52 PM. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Just saw a report that Denver is in the lead in the Cousins sweepstakes based on his stated desire to want to go somewhere where the team is set up to win today and also with relationships between him and Shanahan and Shanahan and Elway....ie Shannahan can help broker a deal.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That being said, I know we should really focus more on signing OL/ILB/Edge in Free Agency rather than a WR. I wouldn't mind seeing us sign 3 of the following: Anthony Hitchens, Demarcus Lawrence (not likely), Ezekiel Ansah, Andrew Norwell, Malcom Butler, Nate Solder, Sammy Watkins, or Demaryius Thomas Picking up 3 of those guys would go a long ways to letting us pick BPA, and with the amassed picks I have in my scenario, wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Last edited by Wyatt; 01-31-2018 at 03:24 PM. |
|
|