#441
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#442
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If he can do that he is one bad ass mutha! |
The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsfever (02-27-2020) |
#443
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Luck4Reich For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsfever (02-27-2020) |
#444
|
|||
|
|||
So the comparison isn't similar. What the hell was your point then? Are you trying to say the Colts should take a stab at a QB just because it might be the next Mahomes? Good call.
|
#445
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016 |
#446
|
||||
|
||||
Rookie contracts are cheap but, yeah, there are a lot of holes to fill. You know who would have masked them somewhat but, he quit last year. We'll see
__________________
Soda's Picks Champion: 2014, 2016 |
#447
|
|||
|
|||
The Colts should take a stab at a QB in the draft because they are currently without a bonafide quality starter at that position. Unless you have a solid young QB already, you should draft one every year.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to albany ed For This Useful Post: | ||
#448
|
|||
|
|||
Am I talking to walls here? Is everyone just reading four or five words? Holy shit, IF THE COLTS SIGN RIVERS, THEY DON'T NEED TO DRAFT A QB IN THE FIRST ROUND.
IF THEY DON'T SIGN RIVERS, by all means, THEN DRAFT A QB. Try reading a full post before parroting your views. |
#449
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not sure why you didnt get that. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Coltsfever For This Useful Post: | ||
Luck4Reich (02-28-2020) |
#450
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
The Following User Says Thank You to Racehorse For This Useful Post: | ||
Luck4Reich (02-28-2020) |
|
|