#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
They aren't "perceived" and there are at least two, one on the end of each of his arms. Then there is the blocking thing... that makes three. They let all this "talent" go after trying to fix these "perceived" problems. A 25 year old first round with lots of talent |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by testcase448; 03-20-2018 at 09:10 PM. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think it's at all ridiculous to question Ballard this offseason. He's made some good decisions, I haven't completely written him off. But he's also
- cut Vontae Davis for some reason - cut John Hankins for some reason - ignored or whiffed on the top OL options in FA two years in a row - tried to hire a dickhead that we all now universally revile in McDaniels, supposedly after a full year of relationship building To me those are not winning moves. I'm happy with the extra draft picks, but I'm not thrilled that the FA strategy is going to force the team to target certain positions in the draft based on roster need. It wasn't necessary. And it's clear Ballard knows the OL isn't good enough. He wouldn't have tried to get Norwell, Jensen, or Pugh if he thought otherwise. But he couldn't close any of those despite the most cap space we've ever had as a team. Yeah it's too early to say Ballard is a clown, that he sucks, that he should be fired. But there's plenty of reason to question his decision-making. I've said from the beginning I'd trust him until he gave me a reason not to, and he's now given Colts fans multiple reasons to at least wonder about his judgement. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I sure hope Hooker and Wilson match up to the teams ideal visions for their positions. Hate to seem them cut for not matching up. Sound ridiculous? Absolutely, but is the Haskins release really significantly different? I don’t think so. Last edited by rm1369; 03-20-2018 at 03:22 PM. |
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post: | ||
Butter (03-20-2018) |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I’ve been against using a high draft pick on a guard, but at this point they might as well - they’ll have a high pick again next year. Maybe then they can address more impact positions like pass rusher. I’ll admit before hand that I’m going to lose my shit if they end up with Barkley. I’d have lost all faith in Ballard at that point. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
I am more ok with a guard at 6 than I was at 3, I will not flip out about Barkley at 6, but I really feel like a team is as well off with RB by committee and using high 1st rounders on many other positions.
|
|
|