#21
|
|||
|
|||
The Browns would be fools to stay at #1 and not take a QB. If they aren't going QB, they will trade out and cash in on the value.
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
So, are you saying the Browns are not fools, or are you saying they will screw this up like always?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. I will be beyond shocked if they don't either take a QB with 1 or trade out.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Dorsey is a very good GM. He’ll make a prudent move.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Still, I think Ballard stays put. Matt Miller said on 670am yesterday that there’s a big drop off at EDGE after Chubb. If the Colts don’t address it there, we’re probably looking at another year without much pass rush. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
There's some speculation that they will try to pick up Kirk Cousins in free agency, which would change a whole lot of this dynamic.
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
It certainly would, but I would be surprised if he signs there if the Donkeys interest in him is legit. Who would willingly go to that dumpster fire if better options are available?
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
I can think of a few million reasons.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post: | ||
#29
|
||||
|
||||
I have been thinking about our odds of trading back and I am not as optimistic of our chances as many on here are. There are three or four QBs coming out that many think could be franchise QBs (Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield and Allen). There is also Jackson, who someone will take a flyer on. There are also seven FA QBs that teams can choose from (Brees, Giraffe, Bradford, McCarron, Keenum, Bridgewater and Cousins).
Here is the list of teams and their QB situation: Arizona Cardinals NEED Atlanta Falcons Ryan Baltimore Ravens Overpaid Flacco Buffalo Bills LOL Carolina Panthers Cam Chicago Bears Trubisky Cincinnati Bengals Dalton Cleveland Browns LOL Dallas Cowboys Dak Denver Broncos Semen/Lynch/Oopsweiler Detroit Lions Stafford Green Bay Packers Rodgers Houston Texans Watson Indianapolis Colts Luck/Brissett Jacksonville Jaguars Bortles Kansas City Chiefs Mahomes? Miami Dolphins Tannehill Minnesota Vikings Bradford/Keenum/Bridgewater (all are FAs!!) New England Patriots Gaydy New Orleans Saints Brees (free agent) New York Giants Eli New York Jets NEED Oakland Raiders Carr Philadelphia Eagles Wentz/Foles Pittsburgh Steelers Rapist San Diego Chargers Rivers San Francisco 49ers Giraffe (free agent, but likely to get tagged/signed) Seattle Seahawks Wilson St. Louis Rams Goff Tampa Bay Buccaneers Winston Tennessee Titans Mariotta Washington Redskins NONE That means we have the Cardinals, Bills, Browns, Jets, Donkeys, and the Foreskins in the market for sure. Minnesota has to re-sign one of their three guys. One could argue that it is time for the Chargers, Giants and Bengals to look for a replacement, and it would not surprise me at all if TB decides Winston is just not good enough to retain. That makes about ten teams in the market, potentially. You would think that Brees and the Giraffe will stay, but if they don't, then you just replace two of the ten teams. The Smith trade took away one potential trade partner because Cousins will fill a void somewhere. We could see Foles and one of the Minny QBs signed or traded which could eliminate two other teams. McCarron may be the heir to Dalton, taking Cincy out of the mix. That would take us to six or seven teams in the market. Maybe Keenum gets a nod if MINN keeps Bradford, lowering it to five teams. Given that CLE and NYG pick before us, that leaves us with just three trade partners in this scenario (Buffalo, NYJ and whoever does not sign Cousins between AZ and DEN). Maybe one of them wants to leapfrog the other, but the odds just don't seem to be there to me.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
Why do you have WAS as none and in the market. They just acquired smith.
|
|
|