ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-31-2018, 04:31 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcubed View Post
So alex smith is traded to WAS. That puts cousins on the market which could throw a big wrench in the draft. What if CLE signs cousins and takes barkley or chubb #1. Or he could sign with one of the other possible trade partners taking them out of play
The Browns would be fools to stay at #1 and not take a QB. If they aren't going QB, they will trade out and cash in on the value.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-31-2018, 06:20 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 17,010
Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,519 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
The Browns would be fools to stay at #1 and not take a QB. If they aren't going QB, they will trade out and cash in on the value.
So, are you saying the Browns are not fools, or are you saying they will screw this up like always?
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-31-2018, 10:48 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,202
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,236 Times in 1,169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
The Browns would be fools to stay at #1 and not take a QB. If they aren't going QB, they will trade out and cash in on the value.
Yes. I will be beyond shocked if they don't either take a QB with 1 or trade out.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-01-2018, 12:03 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
So, are you saying the Browns are not fools, or are you saying they will screw this up like always?
Dorsey is a very good GM. He’ll make a prudent move.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-01-2018, 12:07 AM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
Yes. I will be beyond shocked if they don't either take a QB with 1 or trade out.
Same thing with the Giants at 2. Colts will get Chubb at 3 or possibly trade back if someone loves the next QB available and offers a load.

Still, I think Ballard stays put. Matt Miller said on 670am yesterday that there’s a big drop off at EDGE after Chubb. If the Colts don’t address it there, we’re probably looking at another year without much pass rush.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-01-2018, 12:16 PM
Pez Pez is offline
Accidental Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,576
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 684 Times in 374 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
Yes. I will be beyond shocked if they don't either take a QB with 1 or trade out.
There's some speculation that they will try to pick up Kirk Cousins in free agency, which would change a whole lot of this dynamic.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-01-2018, 01:50 PM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,202
Thanks: 992
Thanked 2,236 Times in 1,169 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pez View Post
There's some speculation that they will try to pick up Kirk Cousins in free agency, which would change a whole lot of this dynamic.
It certainly would, but I would be surprised if he signs there if the Donkeys interest in him is legit. Who would willingly go to that dumpster fire if better options are available?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-01-2018, 10:48 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
It certainly would, but I would be surprised if he signs there if the Donkeys interest in him is legit. Who would willingly go to that dumpster fire if better options are available?
I can think of a few million reasons.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VeveJones007 For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (02-02-2018), rcubed (02-02-2018), smitty46953 (02-01-2018)
  #29  
Old 02-02-2018, 12:14 PM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 17,010
Thanked 4,373 Times in 2,519 Posts
Default

I have been thinking about our odds of trading back and I am not as optimistic of our chances as many on here are. There are three or four QBs coming out that many think could be franchise QBs (Rosen, Darnold, Mayfield and Allen). There is also Jackson, who someone will take a flyer on. There are also seven FA QBs that teams can choose from (Brees, Giraffe, Bradford, McCarron, Keenum, Bridgewater and Cousins).

Here is the list of teams and their QB situation:
Arizona Cardinals NEED
Atlanta Falcons Ryan
Baltimore Ravens Overpaid Flacco
Buffalo Bills LOL
Carolina Panthers Cam
Chicago Bears Trubisky
Cincinnati Bengals Dalton
Cleveland Browns LOL
Dallas Cowboys Dak
Denver Broncos Semen/Lynch/Oopsweiler
Detroit Lions Stafford
Green Bay Packers Rodgers
Houston Texans Watson
Indianapolis Colts Luck/Brissett
Jacksonville Jaguars Bortles
Kansas City Chiefs Mahomes?
Miami Dolphins Tannehill
Minnesota Vikings Bradford/Keenum/Bridgewater (all are FAs!!)
New England Patriots Gaydy
New Orleans Saints Brees (free agent)
New York Giants Eli
New York Jets NEED
Oakland Raiders Carr
Philadelphia Eagles Wentz/Foles
Pittsburgh Steelers Rapist
San Diego Chargers Rivers
San Francisco 49ers Giraffe (free agent, but likely to get tagged/signed)
Seattle Seahawks Wilson
St. Louis Rams Goff
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Winston
Tennessee Titans Mariotta
Washington Redskins NONE

That means we have the Cardinals, Bills, Browns, Jets, Donkeys, and the Foreskins in the market for sure. Minnesota has to re-sign one of their three guys. One could argue that it is time for the Chargers, Giants and Bengals to look for a replacement, and it would not surprise me at all if TB decides Winston is just not good enough to retain. That makes about ten teams in the market, potentially. You would think that Brees and the Giraffe will stay, but if they don't, then you just replace two of the ten teams. The Smith trade took away one potential trade partner because Cousins will fill a void somewhere. We could see Foles and one of the Minny QBs signed or traded which could eliminate two other teams. McCarron may be the heir to Dalton, taking Cincy out of the mix. That would take us to six or seven teams in the market. Maybe Keenum gets a nod if MINN keeps Bradford, lowering it to five teams. Given that CLE and NYG pick before us, that leaves us with just three trade partners in this scenario (Buffalo, NYJ and whoever does not sign Cousins between AZ and DEN). Maybe one of them wants to leapfrog the other, but the odds just don't seem to be there to me.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-02-2018, 12:48 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 934
Thanked 1,476 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Why do you have WAS as none and in the market. They just acquired smith.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.