#41
|
||||
|
||||
I agree with that. In this case at least Hankins was basically signed to a 1 year contract with 2 team options. I suspect Ballard considered it a one year deal.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
2) I don't understand why they released Hankins and kept Woods. I'd think Hankins would be the better 4-3 NT. |
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, yes he would've. That is the point I'm making.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
This was the beginning of me hating fucking Pagano. Freeney is a HOF and Pagano was the POS that let him go way too damn early.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid. |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Fuck Suh. He wouldn't make any difference on this team right now anyway. No way I pay that MF what he thinks he is worth.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
A 4 time first team All Pro on the DL wouldn't make a difference to a bad defense? That's just a bad argument. As far as spending the money, they HAVE to spend some. They're at like 60% of cap right now.
|
#48
|
||||
|
||||
I have a feeling your mind would change if he was on the colts
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
Or you trade the talent for an asset, but I guess they were worried about the guarantee kicking in.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a** |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Which we're not hurting money-wise, so it's confusing.
__________________
Irsay and Ballard got the Reich guy! |
|
|