ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-26-2019, 12:32 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luck4Reich View Post
I agree and depth isnt a bad thing. Also the best rosters dont always make it to the SB. We've seen that happen to the Colts.
Just comparing against the 2005 team, the 2019 Colts will probably be better at QB2, RB3, WR3, WR4, WR5, TE3, DL3, DL4, EDGE4, CB3, CB4, CB5, FS2, SS2. Of course those guys won't see the field as much as the top 1-2 players at each position.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-26-2019, 12:38 PM
rcubed's Avatar
rcubed rcubed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,132
Thanks: 934
Thanked 1,474 Times in 814 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butter View Post
By day 3 he will own every pick in the 7th round.


Awesome post!

I could handle one more trade out of 34 as long as we dont slide too much further down. Then I want him to start picking.

Ballard said he sees picks 15-70 to be basically the same talent level. Spending this whole draft to make us solid across the board is a good strategy if thats true. Then next year go for a real difference maker.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post:
Puck (04-26-2019)
  #43  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:12 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Fins getting Rosen for #48. Really like this draft so far for them.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:49 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,550
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysSunnyinIndy View Post
That is also why I made the comment last night that I think the Colts will try to move up from Pick 89. Try to grab one more player from that bracket.

If they could make 4 selections from that group of players, it has the potential of being a very solid draft class, even if they don't have a pick in the top 30 selections.
I think you've got Ballard figured out. He says what he means. My only caveat is that some of his top 70 may very well slide to 89. It's great that Ballard has a belief system and actually sticks to it. Go Colts
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-26-2019, 02:54 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,550
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Fins getting Rosen for #48. Really like this draft so far for them.
Man if I was an Arizona fan I would be bummed. Taking him #10 in a deep draft, passing on some very good players and then trading him for #48 the very next year. No way to build a team
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:11 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

@FieldYates
A team I'd love to see explore a Chris Harris trade is the Colts. He'd fill a major need, they have the most cap space in the league, he'd fit in with their culture with his great football character, plus Indy GM Chris Ballard has built up plenty of draft capital to use.


Trading draft picks for a veteran would be rather out of character for Chris Ballard.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:34 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 2,550
Thanked 2,430 Times in 1,092 Posts
Default

If we keep the pick it would not surprise me to see us take Jawaan Taylor. He seems to be the best lineman left and Ballard loves lineman. I'll admit,however, that it's a fools errand to try and guess who Ballard likes.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-26-2019, 03:50 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Ian Rapoport
@RapSheet
Keep an eye on this one: The #Jets are looking into making a big move all the way from the third round into the early second, sources tell me and @MikeGarafolo. Would need to give up significant capital in future draft picks.
Would probably take their 2020 2nd along with pick #68.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-26-2019, 04:17 PM
Coltsalr's Avatar
Coltsalr Coltsalr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 4,874
Thanks: 649
Thanked 691 Times in 352 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VeveJones007 View Post
Would probably take their 2020 2nd along with pick #68.
@nfldraftscout
Keep an eye on the Colts as a spot for the Jets to trade up. These two teams have a history of working together.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-26-2019, 04:21 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltsalr View Post
@nfldraftscout
Keep an eye on the Colts as a spot for the Jets to trade up. These two teams have a history of working together.
Jets have been desperate for an EDGE. I'm guessing they want Ferguson.

I wonder if Ballard would have any interest in Leonard Williams. Jets might consider moving him now that they have Quinnen Williams.

Last edited by VeveJones007; 04-26-2019 at 04:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.