#31
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Pass rusher or dt should have a good prospect at 26. Hell I would rather have a wr |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
I agree to no safety in the first round. But, I would like to add a safety somewhere in the draft.
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Of course I would prefer a pass rusher to be BPA at 26, but you know this scheme needs a difference maker at safety who can attack downhill.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We should look at Brandon Graham also, he doesn't get the sack numbers for whatever reason. But his pressure rate is great and consistent. |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Me too but I do t see it as a priority. Decent safeties aren’t that hard to come by. Farley, geathers and Mitchell could all come back relatively cheap
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So of course they won't do any of that and will likely draft a QB that mainly has the ability hand off to their RBs and try to keep from losing games for them |
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
1. DE 2. 3 tech 3. Will 4. SS
__________________
Gonna win it all. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
We have pretty good depth at SS. When Hooker goes down, we have nothing at FS.
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
I understand how we use the SS. We don’t need to spend a 1 on a safety when we have a spotty at best pass rush. We have no good de’s. No great 3 tech or nt.
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Almost any safety can do what Hooker did last year.
|
|
|