ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #341  
Old 10-30-2022, 09:10 PM
ColtBlue ColtBlue is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 167
Thanks: 31
Thanked 48 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Reply With Quote
  #342  
Old 10-30-2022, 09:12 PM
ColtBlue ColtBlue is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 167
Thanks: 31
Thanked 48 Times in 34 Posts
Default

Reply With Quote
  #343  
Old 10-30-2022, 10:02 PM
Spike's Avatar
Spike Spike is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 8,289
Thanks: 9,404
Thanked 5,613 Times in 3,066 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bertjones View Post
Hard loss to swallow. I thought the Colts had earned a win. But Frank
played not to lose offensively and defensively down the stretch and he lost.
The fumbles were killers. The offensive line is crap. seeing Kelly and Nelson
on the sidelines yukking it up while the game was in the balance made me
want to throw a beer through the screen.

On the positive side I thought Ehlinger looked really good, looking forward to seeing more of him. Pierce continues to develop nicely and Cambell is quietly
putting together a nice year.
Hard to think this team isn't playing for next year what with the new QB,
Lousy O line and a D that hasn't been as good as advertised. I think Frank is
gone and it wouldn't break my heart to see Ballard gone too. He's drafted
some good players but he almost seems to revel in leaving gaping holes
in the franchise.
My thoughts exactly when I saw that shit.
__________________
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Spike For This Useful Post:
CletusPyle (10-30-2022)
  #344  
Old 10-30-2022, 10:39 PM
ColtBlue ColtBlue is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Posts: 167
Thanks: 31
Thanked 48 Times in 34 Posts
Default

All in all I thought Sam was decent. I thought he would have had more turnovers than the 1 fumble to be honest. I had no reason to believe a guy with 18 career regular snaps before this game is going to take care of the ball.

Just wish we could've gotten in the endzone on the one Pittman was just short on.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ColtBlue For This Useful Post:
CletusPyle (10-30-2022), Racehorse (10-31-2022)
  #345  
Old 10-30-2022, 10:48 PM
njcoltfan njcoltfan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,570
Thanks: 1,057
Thanked 936 Times in 546 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colts And Orioles View Post
o

I think that they should have gone for it on 4th and inches ...... even if they didn't make it, they would still have 2 chances to win the game.

1) Keep the Commanders out of the end-zone on a 35-yard field.

2) Even if they got into the end zone, the Colts still may have had some time to get into field goal range on offense.


As it is, they probably only have one chance to win the game ...... if the Commanders score, the Colts probably won't have much (if any) time at all to come back with a field goal themselves.

o
I definitely would have gone for 2 after the Hines TD, it made no sense no to !!
Reply With Quote
  #346  
Old 10-30-2022, 11:06 PM
CletusPyle's Avatar
CletusPyle CletusPyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 3,932
Thanks: 6,454
Thanked 3,742 Times in 2,174 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColtBlue View Post
All in all I thought Sam was decent. I thought he would have had more turnovers than the 1 fumble to be honest. I had no reason to believe a guy with 18 career regular snaps before this game is going to take care of the ball.

Just wish we could've gotten in the endzone on the one Pittman was just short on.
Pitt has to get that into the endzone....I think he was a little undecided as to whether to go outside or straight ahead and kind of lost some of his momentum!
__________________
"I went to Ancestry.com and Jim Bob Cooter and me are cousins!”
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CletusPyle For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (10-31-2022), Spike (10-30-2022)
  #347  
Old 10-30-2022, 11:52 PM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,150
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 1,413 Times in 782 Posts
Default

This game fuckin hurt

I’m sick of saying it…. Fuckin turnovers

Taylor’s fumble was terrible

How do we not run a QB sneak from the 1???
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to apballin For This Useful Post:
Colts And Orioles (10-31-2022), Spike (10-30-2022)
  #348  
Old 10-31-2022, 12:32 AM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,498
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 3,854 Times in 2,150 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ColtBlue View Post
Lol what a dork
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (10-31-2022)
  #349  
Old 10-31-2022, 12:35 AM
Chromeburn's Avatar
Chromeburn Chromeburn is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,498
Thanks: 1,466
Thanked 3,854 Times in 2,150 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apballin View Post
This game fuckin hurt

I’m sick of saying it…. Fuckin turnovers

Taylor’s fumble was terrible

How do we not run a QB sneak from the 1???
He has had a week of work. Probably hasn’t taken snaps under center and you have to practice it. And that’s an RPO look and it is the most effective short yardage package in the nfl bc it forces the defense to spread out and cover multiple options.
Reply With Quote
  #350  
Old 10-31-2022, 10:17 AM
apballin apballin is offline
Doom -N- Gloom
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,150
Thanks: 2,244
Thanked 1,413 Times in 782 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
He has had a week of work. Probably hasn’t taken snaps under center and you have to practice it. And that’s an RPO look and it is the most effective short yardage package in the nfl bc it forces the defense to spread out and cover multiple options.
You’ll never convince me RPO from the 1 is more effective then a QB sneak
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.