#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Last edited by jasperhobbs; 03-16-2020 at 04:46 PM. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jasperhobbs For This Useful Post: | ||
AlwaysSunnyinIndy (03-18-2020), Spike (03-16-2020) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Huh? Considerably different situations.
And I’m not hugely down on the trade. I can see the logic and the talent, but I certainly have concerns. Namely the cost of such a high pick AND a $21 / yr contract. Surprisingly this looks like win now mode to me. This a sign it is Rivers? |
The Following User Says Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post: | ||
Chromeburn (03-16-2020) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quick thought - I like the trade. I was thinking Kinlaw at 13 but there was no guarantee he would be there or become what we would expect. We get a proven guy in his prime years at a spot that was sorely needed.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rcubed For This Useful Post: | ||
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
It's risky for the reasons RM1369 said - we are giving up a first and paying the guy full market rates. And we don't know him as well as we know our own free agents, so that's a bit of a wild card as well, not to mention the fact that you never know how a guy will react to receiving this kind of money. So I think it's risky for a lot of reasons.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
Rivers only wants to play for two more years. We will still have to find a QB. Rivers is a stopgap.
|
|
|