#181
|
||||
|
||||
They can't though. He would have to go through waivers to be on the team again. And we would have to be first on the waiver wire for him to clear it.
|
#182
|
|||
|
|||
If Brissett struggles you give Chad Kelly a chance.
|
#183
|
|||
|
|||
Why would Luck have to clear waivers? He wasn’t waived. He retired. Am I missing something?
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
There is some irony right there
|
#185
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I thought he would still be under contract, I don't know how that would work with his contract. But I guess the 24 was a settlement deal so maybe the Colts don't have a claim on him. Might work differently in the off season. |
#186
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Actually it sounds like it may be right - if he returns before the trade deadline. Apparently its different because he reported to training camp and then retired. If Luck unretires anytime after the trade deadline this year he won't be subject to waivers. He would be under contract with the Colts.
|
#188
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
What's worse. Whitlock today said Luck will be back in two years and he will play for the Cowboys. Then a patriots fan came in and said the patriots after Brady retires. |
#189
|
||||
|
||||
Walkers got this
|
#190
|
||||
|
||||
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
apballin (08-27-2019), JAFF (08-27-2019), Maniac (08-27-2019), omahacolt (08-27-2019), smitty46953 (08-27-2019), VeveJones007 (08-27-2019) |
|
|