ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2019, 05:55 PM
Hoopsdoc Hoopsdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,388
Thanks: 876
Thanked 3,134 Times in 1,500 Posts
Default

Depending on the cap hit and potential dead cap money, it certainly is for the Colts.

I’m not sure if it is for Jacoby.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:00 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,516 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Depending on the cap hit and potential dead cap money, it certainly is for the Colts.

I’m not sure if it is for Jacoby.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2852109-jacoby-brissett-colts-reportedly-close-on-new-contract-after-luck-retirement


The quote below is from the article

Quote:
f anything, Indianapolis comes away as the winner from this move. Brissett's average salary will rank 19th among quarterbacks, and many of the players below him are QBs still on their rookie contracts.

In the event Brissett isn't ultimately the long-term successor to Luck, going in a different direction after the 2019 or 2020 seasons shouldn't be too difficult for the Colts.

Brissett might have cost himself some money down the road by agreeing to terms now, but the door will be open for him in two years to either get a hefty raise via the franchise tag or a longer, more lucrative extension.
I'm suprised he took the lower money. But he works out, the Colts caught a huge break
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JAFF For This Useful Post:
Hoopsdoc (09-02-2019)
  #3  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:14 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2852109-jacoby-brissett-colts-reportedly-close-on-new-contract-after-luck-retirement


The quote below is from the article



I'm suprised he took the lower money. But he works out, the Colts caught a huge break
Holder says it’s a new two year deal ($30MM for 2019-2020). Makes a lot more sense for Brissett now.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:00 PM
ChoppedWood ChoppedWood is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 3,555
Thanks: 4,589
Thanked 3,062 Times in 1,687 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Depending on the cap hit and potential dead cap money, it certainly is for the Colts.

I’m not sure if it is for Jacoby.
Yeah I gotta believe this is a "we're going to make sure you feel like you are taken care of this year and we'll pay you well for your services now, but understand, it's on you, carry us to the promised land and we'll tear this up in Feb and start over and this will look like peanuts, but if you don't, this is all you're getting from us" type deal...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:05 PM
JAFF JAFF is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,057
Thanks: 2,385
Thanked 2,516 Times in 1,415 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc View Post
Depending on the cap hit and potential dead cap money, it certainly is for the Colts.

I’m not sure if it is for Jacoby.
If he plays well, and he doesn't sign an extention, they could be forced to put the franchise tag on him. Thats $15 million a year, all on that years cap.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:09 PM
VeveJones007 VeveJones007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,111
Thanks: 1,209
Thanked 1,114 Times in 612 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAFF View Post
If he plays well, and he doesn't sign an extention, they could be forced to put the franchise tag on him. Thats $15 million a year, all on that years cap.
Closer to $18MM. Maybe $20MM next year.

For perspective, Mike Glennon got 3/$45MM from the Bears two years ago, then the Bears drafted Trubisky. Colts could take a similar path. This extension doesn’t prohibit any direction they decide to take.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2019, 06:58 PM
Lawrence Owen Lawrence Owen is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Indiana
Posts: 297
Thanks: 103
Thanked 460 Times in 183 Posts
Default

Considering I feel Brissett is a Prescott type player, And Dak wants $40 frieken mil now...I'd say this is a bargain.
Granted many will point out Brissett hasn't 'earned' starting $ yet..but the fact is, he is the starter, and should be getting more that what he was being paid.
Next year, Luck's contract will be basically void, (i think about 6.5 mil of signing bonus is paid, and that's it) So It's not like Indy is losing $$ in this deal in any way. They'll still have more cap space next year than this year..lol.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lawrence Owen For This Useful Post:
VeveJones007 (09-02-2019)
  #8  
Old 09-02-2019, 10:21 PM
smitty46953's Avatar
smitty46953 smitty46953 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,954
Thanks: 3,351
Thanked 1,958 Times in 1,040 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Workhorse View Post
$20 million guaranteed. Wow.
Welcome back you old Horse …
__________________
Never argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience !!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to smitty46953 For This Useful Post:
Workhorse (09-02-2019)
  #9  
Old 09-03-2019, 12:23 AM
Chaka's Avatar
Chaka Chaka is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 858
Thanks: 336
Thanked 666 Times in 285 Posts
Default

A bit rich for my blood. I would have just assumed wait to see how he does before talking extension with him, given his limited track record (he threw only 4 passes all last year). However, listening to some of your comments I can see the rationale for doing it now I guess. That said, as we sit here today, I would have pegged his value on a new two-year contract at about $8-10 million per, particularly since we already had him locked in at $2-3 million this year.

But the Colts certainly know him better than I do, and I guess I could look at it as a positive that they like him enough to pay him that much (there’s also the lingering issue that we don’t know all the contract details yet, specifically what the $20 million is guaranteed against).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2019, 03:05 AM
Butter's Avatar
Butter Butter is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,663
Thanks: 1,060
Thanked 2,796 Times in 1,446 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaka View Post
specifically what the $20 million is guaranteed against).
Pretty sure it is guaranteed against not getting paid it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Butter For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (09-03-2019)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.