#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
But Henry Anderson has been a 5-tech since college. He never played in anything but a 3-4 college or pro. Tillery has been a DT in a 4-3 all through college. The situations are not the same. Tillery has showed enough burst to be a 3-tech and has a frame that could put on more weight and could potentially play NT. The guy seems pretty scheme diverse. Also you have to ask what the defense asked of him, ND likes to keep their LBs free from linemen. Tillery’s RAS score is just below Q Williams so he has the athletiscm.
Last edited by Chromeburn; 04-10-2019 at 10:39 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
YDFL Commish (04-10-2019) |
#33
|
||||
|
||||
That’s the nice thing about the draft. We will find out in a couple years how these guy turn out.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
VeveJones007 (04-10-2019) |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
The Following User Says Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post: | ||
FatDT (04-11-2019) |
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Well fuck, I guess he played a lot of 3-tech at Stanford too in nickle packages. Well just ignore my earlier post, I thought he was always a 5-tech. I really wonder why they did let him go then. https://www.profootballfocus.com/new...henry-anderson Last edited by Chromeburn; 04-10-2019 at 02:19 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Chromeburn For This Useful Post: | ||
FatDT (04-11-2019) |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Winning is important. Who cares how it happens?
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to omahacolt For This Useful Post: | ||
Butter (04-10-2019), Dam8610 (04-10-2019), FatDT (04-11-2019), Luck4Reich (04-10-2019), YDFL Commish (04-10-2019) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Exactly. Using length and strength to win is just as good as using explosion to win, maybe even better in some cases because it causes less exposure to a big play in the run game.
Also, based on where Eberflus came from, he values length and athleticism in all his DL. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Ballard and Eberflus do. Again, I’m arguing what I believe they think, as evidenced by statements and moves that they’ve made. I think they prefer interior DL who get penetration immediately and I don’t think Tillery fits that mold; thus, I don’t think they’ll view him as a fit worthy of a top 34 pick.
I could be completely wrong. Maybe Tillery is capable. Maybe Eberflus wants more players with versatility so that he can change depending on opponent, conditions, down/distance, etc. |
|
|