ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum   ColtFreaks.com Home Page

Go Back   ColtFreaks.com - Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum > Indianapolis Colts Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2026, 04:45 PM
ukcolt ukcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,317
Thanks: 93
Thanked 382 Times in 197 Posts
Default Kyle Pitts instead of Michael Pittman?

Kyle Pitts is hitting the free agent market, and had a really good year last year, almost meeting his rookie stats, with over 900 yards on 88 receptions, which was significantly more than what Pittman managed to produce this year. I know one is a receiver, and the other a TE, but i am not so sure that their roles are really that significantly different. Pitts mainly plays off the line of scrimmage, and Pittman has been a big bodied WR, who mainly plays the middle of the field.

The top 5 TE's are earning between $15-19m a year, which is a lot less than what Pittman is projected to earn going forward.

If we had a receiving corps of Pierce, Downs, Pitts and Warren with Dulin, Gould, maybe Coleman Owen a mid round receiver, or mid level free agent pickup, i would be quite content that this would be something that Steichen could make work really well, for a lot less cap costs.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ukcolt For This Useful Post:
ChoppedWood (02-10-2026), YDFL Commish (02-10-2026)
  #2  
Old 02-10-2026, 08:30 PM
YDFL Commish YDFL Commish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Mt. Pleasant Wisconsin
Posts: 4,351
Thanks: 3,096
Thanked 3,326 Times in 1,763 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ukcolt View Post
Kyle Pitts is hitting the free agent market, and had a really good year last year, almost meeting his rookie stats, with over 900 yards on 88 receptions, which was significantly more than what Pittman managed to produce this year. I know one is a receiver, and the other a TE, but i am not so sure that their roles are really that significantly different. Pitts mainly plays off the line of scrimmage, and Pittman has been a big bodied WR, who mainly plays the middle of the field.

The top 5 TE's are earning between $15-19m a year, which is a lot less than what Pittman is projected to earn going forward.

If we had a receiving corps of Pierce, Downs, Pitts and Warren with Dulin, Gould, maybe Coleman Owen a mid round receiver, or mid level free agent pickup, i would be quite content that this would be something that Steichen could make work really well, for a lot less cap costs.
I like the concept...if Pitts is a willing and capable blocker.
__________________
"Some people just don't know when it's time to be the voice of reason and when it's time to be the voice of discontent."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Yesterday, 07:45 AM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,999
Thanks: 317
Thanked 1,495 Times in 711 Posts
Default

I like Pittman, always have. He is the type of receiver that keeps the chains moving. But, $29,000,000 cap hit? Unless he can be renegotiated to a way more cap friendly contract, he'll have to be released. I'm not sure ANY wide receiver is worth that kind of cap hit.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to albany ed For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (Yesterday)
  #4  
Old Yesterday, 12:14 PM
Mr. Session's Avatar
Mr. Session Mr. Session is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 864
Thanks: 372
Thanked 707 Times in 322 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
I like the concept...if Pitts is a willing and capable blocker.
Coming from someone from Atlanta, if Pitts is the same Pitts he's been every other year, he is not going to be loved here.

Maybe him and Warren remind everyone of Gronkowski & Hernandez, but I doubt it.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mr. Session For This Useful Post:
YDFL Commish (Yesterday)
  #5  
Old Yesterday, 02:19 PM
Oldcolt Oldcolt is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,623
Thanks: 2,915
Thanked 2,896 Times in 1,311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YDFL Commish View Post
I like the concept...if Pitts is a willing and capable blocker.
So is Pittman, it may be what he does best. He knows 29 million is too much for him, I bet he renegotiates a long term extension that is favorable to the cap this year. Pittman isn't the problem. Keep him if possible.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Oldcolt For This Useful Post:
apballin (Yesterday), Colts And Orioles (Yesterday), YDFL Commish (Yesterday)
  #6  
Old Yesterday, 04:22 PM
Dam8610 Dam8610 is offline
Post whore
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 6,484
Thanks: 119
Thanked 2,130 Times in 1,209 Posts
Default

I like this idea. Trade Pittman for what you can and sign Pitts for less overall. Steichen likes 12 personnel anyway, why not give him two of the best TEs in the league, both of whom are matchup problems? If you get a day 2 pick and $10 million or so more in cap room, that's a win from a cap management perspective.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
i was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Yesterday, 05:28 PM
ukcolt ukcolt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,317
Thanks: 93
Thanked 382 Times in 197 Posts
Default

I am not really bothered about Pitts being able to block, as may normally be required from a traditional TE, i am utilising him in a similar way to Pittman.

I am also not overly bothered about getting draft compensation for Pittman, i wouldn't expect anything more than a 5th or 6th at the tops anyway. Really trying to find a cheaper way of getting top quality production. Paying top dollar on pass catching TE's is a cheaper way than paying an average WR to give similar output.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Today, 08:50 AM
albany ed albany ed is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,999
Thanks: 317
Thanked 1,495 Times in 711 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldcolt View Post
So is Pittman, it may be what he does best. He knows 29 million is too much for him, I bet he renegotiates a long term extension that is favorable to the cap this year. Pittman isn't the problem. Keep him if possible.
I agree. If he agrees to a renegotiation, then keep him. If he doesn't, you're not going to find a single team willing to trade for that cap hit. So, it's either renegotiate or he gets released, which makes him a free agent. Other teams can then sign him without paying that enormous cap hit.
__________________
Hey, it's your world. I'm just gonna play in it for a while.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to albany ed For This Useful Post:
Oldcolt (Today)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
ColtFreaks.com is in no way affiliated with the Indianapolis Colts, the NFL, or any of their subsidiaries.