|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Simple math
Is he better than what we have? YES Is he better than what we could get with those picks? Most Likely For a 4 and and 6th round you do it |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
For that, yeah, I'd do it. For a 3rd, yeah probably. He has two years left on his rookie contract, one of which is a team option year. See if he can behave and fit in, and if so, give him an extension. If not, cut him. I would not give up a 2nd, no. But a 3rd, sure.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FatDT For This Useful Post: | ||
Coltsalr (02-20-2018) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I'll give 'em TJ Green and a 6th rounder.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I would only take him if the Colts move down from 3 (not saying they will or should; I think they should stay) and pick up some extra 2nd-3rd round capital.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think the Chiefs would be wise to hold Peters until the draft to potentially maximize return but I could also see them dealing him sooner rather than later in order to get a clearer picture of their team headed into free agency. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
You'd have to give them a couple 1st rounders too if you throw Green in the mix
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Rams gave up a 2018 4th founder and a 2019 2nd rounder.
I don’t know, I feel like I would’ve done this... |
The Following User Says Thank You to Coltsalr For This Useful Post: | ||
Discflinger (02-26-2018) |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Yes, but Ballad knows him and it sounds like he had no interest. There is something really hinky there.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Yeah, I like the theory that there’s something there. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Hell yes for that, no fucking way they do it for that. Is there anything more than idle speculation they even are all that motivated to move him?
|
|
|