View Single Post
  #6  
Old 02-13-2017, 11:19 AM
sherck's Avatar
sherck sherck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 3,753
Thanks: 1,819
Thanked 1,197 Times in 528 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by omahacolt View Post
I always preferred the 4-3. Other than 3-4 teams generally have better coverage units on special teams due to extra lbers.
I don't disagree with you. I thought that the Bears defense of the 2000s and the Dungy 4-3 were pretty effective models of defense.

There just never seems to be enough quality LBs to go around so more and more teams converting to a 3-4 seems to be making that problem worse.

Be interesting to see who will be HCing the Colts next season and if that will bring a change back to a 4-3.

Cheers,
__________________
==============
Thad
The future is so bright; I gotta triple up!
Reply With Quote