View Single Post
  #127  
Old 08-29-2017, 07:51 AM
DrSpaceman DrSpaceman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 3,349
Thanks: 212
Thanked 674 Times in 311 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dam8610 View Post
If there is literally one thing you can point to in 5 years, you don't have an argument.



http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/201609...yze=playbyplay



The ball was snapped at 1:14 prior to the Moncrief play. Assuming an averageplay length of 5 seconds, the play ended at 1:09. A full 40 second runoff would've seen a snap at :29 remaining, and because the play took 6 seconds, a TD with :23 remaining. The Lions got an extra 14 seconds on that play. Did it make a difference?




The bolded portion is the portion that doesn't happen with the additional 14 second runoff. So, it turns out that the referenced timeout actually had zero bearing on the outcome of the game.
Are you being sarcastic?

They called a time out with 12 seconds. take off 14 seconds, game is over, no FG. Colts win.

AM I missing something here? It seems you just proved it lost the game for the Colts.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DrSpaceman For This Useful Post:
omahacolt (08-29-2017), Racehorse (08-29-2017)