Quote:
Originally Posted by testcase448
Two Super Bowls, one win. Manning caried them there. He had parts of the puzzle in place. Luck isn't Manning, hell BRADY isn't Manning. Name a "franchise " QB that gets this team anywhere for the next several years. IF they survive the beating
27 to 0, we won't be competetive with them for about 4-5 years now.Or Hoston, or Nashville..Or the Jets or ANYBODY but CLeveland maybe.
Luck is damaged goods. Maybe we get a shot at another franchise QB this year, and next.... and the year after. Drafting first does result in opportunity to draft fanchise QBs. Maybe that's the plan, draft one every few years!
KC builds a solid team, adds Alex Smith...
OAKLAND Derek Carr, 36th pick
Case Keenum Vikings5-2
Bills, Tyrod Taylor LMAO 6th round pick 4-2
Miami 4-2 with Cutler?
Dak Prescott 4th round.. he just beat the fuck outta a team on their field by 30 we BARELY managed to beat at home
My "dumbass arguement"seems pretty not dumbass compared to completely obvious statements like "every GM wants a franchise QB"
No kidding moron. Really?
But here's a gold plated fact, everyone of those teams I just listed are a shit load better than us and not a damn franchise QB in the lot that YOU"D trade Luck for.
Now ask all those drooling GMs if they'd trade TEAMS, give up their solid TEAMS for Luck. What would they give? Which team
The answer is no.
|
Serious question: What do you consider the definitionof a franchise QB to be, because it seems that you really don't know what it is, based on this post.
Also, if you replace the Moron in charge, this team will look immensely better.