Quote:
Originally Posted by HoosierinFL
This is basically my feeling, and even if I agree with Brett Kollman's most recent film room, in which he says Barkley is the best RB prospect in over a decade and is the second coming of LaDainian Tomlinson, I still don't know about taking him at 3. I'd hate to miss out on him, but I'd likewise hate to leave holes on a defense that is more full of holes than the offense.
Also, not sure why Chubb wouldn't have an immediate Freeney-like impact. He's a slightly different kind of player so may not expect the speed-demon outside rushes, but he is still the kind of guy who can come in and have an impact right away.
|
The question on my mind is not if Chubb cannot have an immediate impact.
My question is if he is THAT much better than Arden Key whom will very probably be available at the top of the 2nd round?
Or is Chubb that much better than Davenport where we could trade back, pick up more 2nd or 3rd round picks and then pick Davenport in the middle of the 1st round?
If people were saying that he is Von Miller-like, then you take him at #3 no questions asked.
But folks are saying that he is complete and good and NFL ready but not transcendent.
I would like more picks for potentially good NFL players rather than less picks for potentially great NFL players. Lets get all 22 spots up to NFL average / good before worrying about NFL great.
Walk Worthy,