View Single Post
  #25  
Old 12-02-2019, 10:24 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,103
Thanks: 297
Thanked 738 Times in 411 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chromeburn View Post
I think quarterback takes top priority and you do what you need to to get the best you can. If we wanted to draft a DT should have done it last draft, that was the draft to do it.

QB then address the other positions. Although a WR in the first three rounds would be preferable, a guy who can run routes and knows the nuances of the position instead of some athletic project.

Lots of athletic ends in the style we like in the next draft.
I don’t like the “do what you need to to get the best you can” thinking. I’m guessing you don’t mean it quite the way it comes off. Trading significant draft capital for a marginal improvement over JB isn’t in the teams best interest. They need a franchise QB, not a slightly better QB. If Ballard believes a guy is a franchise guy then yeah do what it takes. But chasing the best they can get in the draft at QB is a recipe for disaster.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
Racehorse (12-03-2019)