10-24-2018, 08:49 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,203
Thanks: 22,237
Thanked 5,786 Times in 3,286 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369
I would disagree with you. I believe teams use short term vets all the time, although I guess it depends on your definition of short term.
I think many are scarred by Grigson’s reign. I’ve said before, and I know most will disagree, there was no problem with Grigson’s strategy, but there were major issues with his execution. Even with mostly mediocre acquisitions in free agency the team made a quick turnaround and was in an AFC title game. The main issue was Grigson sucked at drafting and no young talent was taking over starting spots.
If Ballard drafts as poorly as Grigson he will fail. There is not a team building strategy in existence that doesn’t require good drafting to sustain success.
|
I agree with much of what you wrote. I was referring to rebuilding teams and not established ones. Teams like GB and NE can put in fillers to play, but Washington and Oakland get burnt using that approach.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
|