Thread: The build
View Single Post
  #148  
Old 10-24-2018, 06:47 PM
rm1369 rm1369 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,252
Thanks: 343
Thanked 938 Times in 512 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Racehorse View Post
That is one way to look at it. The other is that bringing in vets is a short term approach. It usually does not translate to long term success.
I would disagree with you. I believe teams use short term vets all the time, although I guess it depends on your definition of short term.

I think many are scarred by Grigson’s reign. I’ve said before, and I know most will disagree, there was no problem with Grigson’s strategy, but there were major issues with his execution. Even with mostly mediocre acquisitions in free agency the team made a quick turnaround and was in an AFC title game. The main issue was Grigson sucked at drafting and no young talent was taking over starting spots.

If Ballard drafts as poorly as Grigson he will fail. There is not a team building strategy in existence that doesn’t require good drafting to sustain success.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rm1369 For This Useful Post:
omahacolt (10-24-2018)