05-02-2018, 01:11 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 4,137
Thanks: 937
Thanked 1,481 Times in 815 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FatDT
As complicated as everyone wants to make it, it's simple. Ballard has an overall vision for the team. He has an idea of what the team needs, this year and future years, to be successful. And so with that vision in mind he values players a certain way, and picks the best player for his team, his vision. It is not some sort of objective Madden score where he'll pick an 84 TE over an 81 DE when his vision demands an upgrade at the DE position and not TE. For Ballard, the BPA in that situation is the DE.
It is clear from Hankins and Anderson that scheme fit matters a lot to Ballard, so he is not going to pick a great player that doesn't do well the things he wants that position to do.
|
Isnt this how any competent GM is supposed to work?
|