Thread: Realistic Draft
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 04-06-2018, 11:25 AM
Racehorse's Avatar
Racehorse Racehorse is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: God's green Earth
Posts: 14,360
Thanks: 22,912
Thanked 5,921 Times in 3,366 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rm1369 View Post
For the Colts it hurts their trade back options but would likely mean Barkley is available to them since 4 is his most likely landing spot and I don’t see him going to Denver. I’m afraid if he’s there, with Irsays urging, he would be the Colts pick. So for me that could very well be the worst case draft scenario. Other than the additional player pushed down a few spots I don’t see it making a difference at all after the top ten since it’s assumed the top QBs will be off the board by then anyway. Certainly no later than 11 or 12 to Miami or Buffalo.

I guess if done pre draft it could make Buffalo desperate and drive up the price the Giants can ask from them for #2. But again, after the top 10 it’s not going to matter I don’t think.
But it could make our pick more attractive to those who want to trade up for the last QB available.
__________________
Keep your political crap out of a football forum! Nobody here gives a rat's a**
Reply With Quote